On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:50:55 +0100, "Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapginrafr>
wrote:

>Not only I didn't realise that the unsupported functions were not supported
>when calling a function, but I shamefully admit that I never considered the
>dot operator as being a vector function...

That's because it's listed in the float functions. I understand it
returns a float, just as vlength, but still it seems logical to me to
have it in the vector functions, maybe in both to follow the current
logic.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message