|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:00:31 -0400, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msn com> wrote:
>But the story bothers me. The painter should have called the patron an
>idiot and left it at that, imo. I mean suppose he'd painted it in a
>single stroke first time then and there! Would that be more, or less,
>impressive/valuable?
That's not the point of stories set in far-a-way lands. It is like
deconstructing a parable IM(ns)HO :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |