On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:44:40 +0200, Margus Ramst <mar### [at] peakeduee>
wrote:

>Peter Popov wrote:
>> 
>> That's exactly what I had in mind. With all the iso frenzy, people
>> seem to have forgotten about the good ole infinite primitives. They
>> still have their uses.
>> 
>Out of curiosity, what uses?
>I.e. how is a "truly infinite" quadric cylinder better than a regular cylinder
>scaled so long that POV considers it infinite?

Attitude :) *I* will know that I've cheated with the latter.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message