Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> writes:

> Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> 
> > I was aware of this article, but it is more than one year old. Furthermore,
> > it contains the sentence:
> > 
> > "We hope to be able to do some of that work [on POV-Ray 4.0] in parallel
> > with our work on 3.5 but that may be wishful thinking."
> > 
> > That's why I asked about the current state of POV-Ray 4.0. From your
> > comment I conclude that Chris' wish hasn't been fulfilled.
> 
> Let's suffice it to say that the POV-Team is not willing to discuss
> specific plans for POV-Ray v4.0 at this time and leave it at that.

If so, it's a pity that I cannot throw in my knowledge about expression
templates and design patterns. But perhaps they already know about all
this stuff...

Thomas

-- 
http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)

Post a reply to this message