Robert Alan Byer <bye### [at] mailourserversnet> writes:
> 
> In "TOKENIZE.C" there is the following section of code...
> 
> /***************************************************************************
> * Not-quite-so-Static functions
> ****************************************************************************/
[...]
> Now, the problem is that when it comes to the actual functions, they are
> still defined as "static".
> 
> So the function prototype can be either "static" or not but the function
> it's self is "static"?
> 
> (That is, if I'm reading all this correct).
> 
> Now, my compiler will still compile it, but with warnings.

From my limited knowledge of the code I can say that they can be static. 
More precisely, I have compiled the megapatch for Sun Solaris and I've 
had the same warnings. So, I've changed the not-quite-so-static 
functions to static functions and it worked fine for me.
Despite this fact I would like to know too, why they are considered 
not-quite-so-static.

Thomas


-- 
http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)

Post a reply to this message