7no### [at] ezwvcom (Glen Berry) writes:

> On 16 Jun 1999 15:41:35 -0400, par### [at] fwicom (Ron Parker) wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:57:52 GMT, Glen Berry wrote:
> >>Does this mean yet another enhancement for a future version of the
> >>Superpatch?
> >
> >Could be.  In fact, the version I tested it on was a slightly-outdated
> >version of the superpatch.  I'll put it in between fixing that mesh
> >queue crash and figuring out a new version-numbering scheme sometime 
> >this weekend.
> 
> I think a new version numbering scheme is an excellent idea. You've
> been updating your software very diligently. It would be nice to have
> a better way to tell if we have the most current published version.

I second this. A unique version numbering for the superpatch would be
useful. I suggest to include the version number in the file names for
the binaries and the source code and print it while rendering.

Thomas

-- 
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm

Post a reply to this message