|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rudy Velthuis" <rve### [at] gmxnet> wrote:
>Yep, that says it all. Windows (whether 95, 98 or NT) is a memory hog. No
>matter what application you start, no matter how much free RAM (you think)
>you have, it's never enough. Windows seems to be swapping just for the sake
>of it, IMHO.
I agree with that. I have 384mb RAM on my development machine (more than most
people have of ram+swap combined) and NT -still- whines and bitches if it
doesn't get a swap file. It wants swap and will use it regardless of physical
memory, like it or not. I think if I put 2 gigabytes in the box, it'd -still-
swap to disk. It's just the way the OS (both Windows and NT) is designed.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
povray.org admin team wrote:
>
> "Rudy Velthuis" <rve### [at] gmxnet> wrote:
>
> >Yep, that says it all. Windows (whether 95, 98 or NT) is a memory hog. No
> >matter what application you start, no matter how much free RAM (you think)
> >you have, it's never enough. Windows seems to be swapping just for the sake
> >of it, IMHO.
>
> I agree with that. I have 384mb RAM on my development machine (more than most
> people have of ram+swap combined) and NT -still- whines and bitches if it
> doesn't get a swap file. It wants swap and will use it regardless of physical
> memory, like it or not. I think if I put 2 gigabytes in the box, it'd -still-
> swap to disk. It's just the way the OS (both Windows and NT) is designed.
In light of this and the other comments in this thread I guess I will
begrudgingly accept the current system for what it is. It doesn't mean
I have to like it though.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a couple of observations about memory managment on my system I would
> like to get your opinions about.
>
> I have a file I rendered just now that has 100k objects and according to
> Pov's stats used a peak memory of 102 megs. I have 128 megs of ram installed
> on my system using two 64 meg 72 pin EDO ram simms in the first bank only.
> My system architecture is supposed to be able to access up to a maximum of
> 128 megs so I have it max'd out.
>
> I also have a windows 98 managed swap file specified in the control panel.
> System resources are 97% free according to several memory reporting utilities.
> That leaves over 120 megs of unused free ram memory.
>
> After rendering the aforementioned scene I checked the size of my HD swap file
> and it was nearly 135 megs in size. It's usual size under windows management is
> 20 megs until a program writes to it.
>
> What I don't understand is with 128 megs of ram memory on board why would my
> swap file ever grow so large when the system memory is sufficient to cover the
> use of the programs being run ? I know the speed increase of using ram memory
> over swap file memory is significant and would prefer to run in that environment.
>
> Anybody ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Windows is a memory hog. i can't run this Sci-fi scene with out running out of
memory (P120 w/24MB RAM and 570 MB free HD) the objects themselves are over 70 MB.
and my HD free space drops to 330 MB and everything else slows to a crawl..... BTW
the scene aforementioned is mostly made up of UDO meshes
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Start up the system monitor and see how much memory is used at the
> moment. You'd be surprised to see how much memory is already hogged up at
> startup...
> It's a Windows thing. Don't try to understand it... :|
Don't try to understand why but what it is doing is loading up
all kinds of DLLs and other files that are used in the boot
process (at least, maybe some other processes) and leaving them
resident.
This was recommended to me for another problem
http://www.meikel.com/freemem/fmemstd.htm
but it didn't help for that one. It might work for some other
problems.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> While I appreciate your comments I was hoping to get just a little
> bit more than that's just the way things are. Are there alternatives
> to the way I have my system set up so as to optimize the performance
> or is windows and the program conspiring against me.
Try http://www.meikel.com/freemem/fmemstd.htm and see if it
help.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |