 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 Jul 1999 10:14:06 +0200, Thomas Willhalm wrote:
>Lummox JR <Lum### [at] aol com> writes:
>
>>
>> http://www.dreamscape.com/lummoxjr/povray
>
>I completely understand making a decent Web page is less interesting
>than hacking POV-Ray. However, I suggest to put up at least one of
>your test pictures that shows a isoblob.
Wow, wonder what you'd say about the superpatch web page. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
par### [at] fwicom (Ron Parker) writes:
> On 27 Jul 1999 10:14:06 +0200, Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> >Lummox JR <Lum### [at] aolcom> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> http://www.dreamscape.com/lummoxjr/povray
> >
> >I completely understand making a decent Web page is less interesting
> >than hacking POV-Ray. However, I suggest to put up at least one of
> >your test pictures that shows a isoblob.
>
> Wow, wonder what you'd say about the superpatch web page. :)
Are you talking about http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/ ?
How about adding a least a picture ? :-)
Seriously: I didn't want to be rude. If some one understood my
comment this way, I apologize. Although my knowledge about the
English language is increasing, I have still problems to express
my opinions.
If I remember correctly, there was a superpatch web patch with a
picture that uses at least three of the new features. This might
have been the disappeared page at the twysted.net patchstation.
Thomas
--
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It is a bit ironic that Ron P. has a web page tutorial there at:
http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/homepage.html
and yet lacks a link from his default page to the SuperPatch page (yes,
it is rather bleak there, isn't it :)
I'm not complaining one bit though, to me utilities, patches and such
all seem at home on a FTP-looking page.
About the English, when to worry is if you get 90% or better at it. Then
we English-speaking folk can begin impromptu grammar classes on you.
Otherwise I think you're safe because we know the lesser capable are
trying to type right and so read accordingly. Saying all this half in
jest btw, and saying this so I don't get blamed for something.
Thomas Willhalm wrote:
>
> > Wow, wonder what you'd say about the superpatch web page. :)
>
> Are you talking about http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/ ?
> How about adding a least a picture ? :-)
>
> Seriously: I didn't want to be rude. If some one understood my
> comment this way, I apologize. Although my knowledge about the
> English language is increasing, I have still problems to express
> my opinions.
>
> If I remember correctly, there was a superpatch web patch with a
> picture that uses at least three of the new features. This might
> have been the disappeared page at the twysted.net patchstation.
>
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:55:18 -0500, Bob Hughes wrote:
>It is a bit ironic that Ron P. has a web page tutorial there at:
>
> http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/homepage.html
eww, gross, I still have that online? Definitely time to redo my
start page, I should think. The info on that page is probably so
outdated it's laughable, and the counter hasn't worked since FWI
nuked my webpage months and months ago and wiped out the script
for it (and subsequently changed their apache config to not allow
.htaccess to do anything meaningful).
Obviously web page design is no longer one of my big priorities.
I should definitely set aside a day or two to whip up a nice page
to put the superpatch on.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Anxiously awaiting that <fingers rapping on desk> but I'm obviously not
the one you would be catering to by doing so.
Ron Parker wrote:
>
> Obviously web page design is no longer one of my big priorities.
> I should definitely set aside a day or two to whip up a nice page
> to put the superpatch on.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:55:18 -0500, Bob Hughes wrote:
> >It is a bit ironic that Ron P. has a web page tutorial there at:
> >
> > http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/homepage.html
>
> eww, gross, I still have that online? Definitely time to redo my
> start page, I should think.
"This page created entirely in the DOS editor"
Nah.... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Lummox JR
Subject: Re: Isoblob patch beta 0.91
Date: 27 Jul 1999 21:56:21
Message: <379E6360.436@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> I completely understand making a decent Web page is less interesting
> than hacking POV-Ray. However, I suggest to put up at least one of
> your test pictures that shows a isoblob.
Suggestion taken. I've added four example scenes (source included) and a
FAQ to the isoblob page.
Lummox JR
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote in message <379c6d1e@news.povray.org>...
>On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 01:24:40 -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
>>Does anyone know anything about using Microsoft Visual C/C++ 1.0 to
compile
>>POV-Ray or the SuperPatch? For example, is it possible?
>
>Maybe as a DOS app, and only for very small scenes. 1.0 was a 16-bit
>only compiler, IIRC. You'd be better off getting a copy of DJGPP or
>Cygwin.
I'm planing to get either MSVC 6 or Borland C++ Builder 3 as soon as fall
semester starts and I find out which compiler the university has decided on.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon de Vet wrote in message <379E5D21.A7070A28@istar.ca>...
>
>
>Ron Parker wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:55:18 -0500, Bob Hughes wrote:
>> >It is a bit ironic that Ron P. has a web page tutorial there at:
>> >
>> > http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/homepage.html
>>
>> eww, gross, I still have that online? Definitely time to redo my
>> start page, I should think.
>
>"This page created entirely in the DOS editor"
>
>Nah.... :)
Created by Microsoft's only bug-free program ... Notepad!
Nah.....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lummox JR <Lum### [at] aolcom> writes:
> Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> > I completely understand making a decent Web page is less interesting
> > than hacking POV-Ray. However, I suggest to put up at least one of
> > your test pictures that shows a isoblob.
>
> Suggestion taken. I've added four example scenes (source included) and a
> FAQ to the isoblob page.
Thank you a lot. This is much more than I expected.
Thomas
--
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
