|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: 3.6.1 won't compile for me on OSX
Date: 3 Feb 2005 11:18:22
Message: <42024ece@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
popov wrote:
>>This answer is plain wrong: Correct answers were given in this thread long
>>before you replied. Please read the thread you are replying to first before
>>you post a clearly wrong answer.
>
> Did you try it?
Yes, how else could I have supplied the flags being used?
> What did you get?
A working version of POV-Ray, of course!
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> >>This answer is plain wrong: Correct answers were given in this thread long
> >>before you replied. Please read the thread you are replying to first before
> >>you post a clearly wrong answer.
> >
> > Did you try it?
>
> Yes, how else could I have supplied the flags being used?
>
> > What did you get?
>
> A working version of POV-Ray, of course!
>
> Thorsten
No I mean:
Did you try: ./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wal" COMPILED_BY="me"
On my system (OSX 10.3.5, ) I get: "C++ compiler cannot create executables"
What do you get?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
popov wrote:
> Note: It is a good practice to turn on all warnings (-Wall) for the gcc
Actually, it is not. It generates plenty of completely bogus warnings.
Only inexperienced people compile with all warnings enabled.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: 3.6.1 won't compile for me on OSX
Date: 3 Feb 2005 12:43:11
Message: <420262af@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
popov wrote:
> No I mean:
>
> Did you try: ./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wal" COMPILED_BY="me"
>
> On my system (OSX 10.3.5, ) I get: "C++ compiler cannot create executables"
>
> What do you get?
Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
this on.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> > Note: It is a good practice to turn on all warnings (-Wall) for the gcc
>
> Actually, it is not. It generates plenty of completely bogus warnings.
> Only inexperienced people compile with all warnings enabled.
>
> Thorsten
> Actually, it is not. It generates plenty of completely bogus warnings.
> Only inexperienced people compile with all warnings enabled.
This is really plain wrong!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> > No I mean:
> >
> > Did you try: ./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wal" COMPILED_BY="me"
> >
> > On my system (OSX 10.3.5, ) I get: "C++ compiler cannot create executables"
> >
> > What do you get?
>
> Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
> this on.
>
> Thorsten
> Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
> this on.
If it is the same (and I thinck it will be) what was so 'plain wrong' on my
post?
(beside the fact the users problem was already solved)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
popov wrote:
> Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>
>>popov wrote:
>>
>>>No I mean:
>>>
>>>Did you try: ./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wal" COMPILED_BY="me"
>>>
>>>On my system (OSX 10.3.5, ) I get: "C++ compiler cannot create executables"
>>>
>>>What do you get?
>>
>>Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
>>this on.
>>
>> Thorsten
>
>
>>Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
>>this on.
>
>
> If it is the same (and I thinck it will be) what was so 'plain wrong' on my
> post?
> (beside the fact the users problem was already solved)
Suggesting that it is a wrong command-line while the problem was a missing
compiler. That also happens to be the most likely cause as the development
tools are not installed by default.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: 3.6.1 won't compile for me on OSX
Date: 3 Feb 2005 13:20:30
Message: <42026b6e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
popov wrote:
>>Actually, it is not. It generates plenty of completely bogus warnings.
>>Only inexperienced people compile with all warnings enabled.
>
> This is really plain wrong!
No, it just shows you have no experience with advanced C++ and using
multiple compilers to compile the same source code.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> >>Actually, it is not. It generates plenty of completely bogus warnings.
> >>Only inexperienced people compile with all warnings enabled.
> >
> > This is really plain wrong!
>
> No, it just shows you have no experience with advanced C++ and using
> multiple compilers to compile the same source code.
>
> Thorsten
So you suggest not to turn warnings on?
This means not to realize them. Most warnings are indeed just warnings (and
some might be bogus). However there might be warnings indicating some
really serious problem. Your code may run but the results may not be
correct.
And sometimes it happens that compiler A does not realize the problem but
compiler B does realize it. Compiling with different compilers and looking
to all warnings is some kind of quality assurance.
But wait, why do I tell this. You have so much experience...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> popov wrote:
> > Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> >
> >>popov wrote:
> >>
> >>>No I mean:
> >>>
> >>>Did you try: ./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wal" COMPILED_BY="me"
> >>>
> >>>On my system (OSX 10.3.5, ) I get: "C++ compiler cannot create executables"
> >>>
> >>>What do you get?
> >>
> >>Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
> >>this on.
> >>
> >> Thorsten
> >
> >
> >>Probably the same, though I cannot try on the system I am currently writing
> >>this on.
> >
> >
> > If it is the same (and I thinck it will be) what was so 'plain wrong' on my
> > post?
> > (beside the fact the users problem was already solved)
>
> Suggesting that it is a wrong command-line while the problem was a missing
> compiler. That also happens to be the most likely cause as the development
> tools are not installed by default.
>
> Thorsten
I thought this info could be of interest for those who have the compiler
installed but get this error. Ok, slightly out of topic but not out of
context and probably not plain wrong.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |