POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.unix: Minor bug in Linux version of 3.5

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unix : Minor bug in Linux version of 3.5		Server Time 28 Jul 2024 12:32:15 EDT (-0400)

From: Rob Brown-Bayliss
Subject: Minor bug in Linux version of 3.5
Date: 11 Jul 2002 17:09:09
Message: <3d2df3f5$1@news.povray.org>

Hi, I notice a very minor bug in 3.5 for linux.

After rendering an image, the time taken in minutes and seconds is
printed to the terminal.

The minutes for the trace time are offten wrong, the seconds correct.

EG:

Time For Parse:    0 hours  0 minutes   5.0 seconds (5 seconds)
Time For Trace:    0 hours  4 minutes  39.0 seconds (204 seconds)
    Total Time:    0 hours  3 minutes  29.0 seconds (209 seconnds)


Like I said, it's a *very* minor bug :o)

Post a reply to this message

From: earthdog
Subject: Re: Minor bug in Linux version of 3.5
Date: 15 Jul 2002 11:00:20
Message: <3d32e383@news.povray.org>

Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:

> Hi, I notice a very minor bug in 3.5 for linux.
> 
> After rendering an image, the time taken in minutes and seconds is
> printed to the terminal.
> 
> The minutes for the trace time are offten wrong, the seconds correct.
> 
> EG:
> 
> Time For Parse:    0 hours  0 minutes   5.0 seconds (5 seconds)
> Time For Trace:    0 hours  4 minutes  39.0 seconds (204 seconds)
>     Total Time:    0 hours  3 minutes  29.0 seconds (209 seconnds)
> 
> 
> Like I said, it's a *very* minor bug :o)

Yep, I noticed that.

Post a reply to this message

From: Felix Wiemann
Subject: Re: Minor bug in Linux version of 3.5
Date: 15 Jul 2002 14:50:42
Message: <3d331982@news.povray.org>

Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:

> The minutes for the trace time are offten wrong, the seconds correct.
> 
> Time For Parse:    0 hours  0 minutes   5.0 seconds (5 seconds)
> Time For Trace:    0 hours  4 minutes  39.0 seconds (204 seconds)
>     Total Time:    0 hours  3 minutes  29.0 seconds (209 seconnds)

Appears to be a problem with +P and has been reported before in p.b-t:

http://news.povray.org/povray.beta-test/25145/
-- 
Felix Wiemann

Post a reply to this message