Thomas Willhalm <tho### [at] willhalmde> wrote:
: I guess that it can be configured
: to be almost as modest as DOS.

  What do you mean "almost"?

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> writes:

> Thomas Willhalm <tho### [at] willhalmde> wrote:
> : I guess that it can be configured
> : to be almost as modest as DOS.
> 
>   What do you mean "almost"?

I wanted to prevent that someone says:
"The linux installation needs 136k more than DOS."

I have a 486DX-33 with 8MB RAM which I use as a router
and printer server. The fact that it runs fine shows
me that the memory consumption of linux isn't too high.
I am, however, not sure enough of my opinion that I
dare to claim that DOS and linux are are equal in this 
respect.

Perhaps I should try to create a linux boot disc 
that is tuned to run POV-Ray. This would enable us to 
see the differences.

Thomas

-- 
http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)

Post a reply to this message