|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is it possible in POVRay to do true surface deformations?
i.e. not normal maps, but true deforms.
Thanks
-ss-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:40:50 +0200, "Soulstorm" <der### [at] gomailcoza>
wrote:
> Is it possible in POVRay to do true surface deformations?
> i.e. not normal maps, but true deforms.
look at http://news.povray.org/povray.general/22382/
(is this answered in vfaq?)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
: (is this answered in vfaq?)
It's the same problem as with bending:
http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povQandT/languageQandT.html#bending
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:40:50 +0200, Soulstorm wrote...
> Is it possible in POVRay to do true surface deformations?
> i.e. not normal maps, but true deforms.
If you knew the formula of the primitive and the formula for the
deformation, I suspect you could use an isosurface, but as to exactly
how. Well, that's beyond my skills.
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't think it's the same problem as with bending...
The normals are created with mathematical formulae, same with the
primitives - I am sure with the right combination of these two it would be
quite possible to do true surface deforms. The problem with bending is that
the mathematics behind bending a mathematical abstract is supposedly very
complex.
Well - I am not a maths guru, so if I am wrong, it won't surprize me too
much - it would be nice to know though...
-ss-
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3c750e72@news.povray.org...
> : (is this answered in vfaq?)
>
> It's the same problem as with bending:
>
> http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povQandT/languageQandT.html#bending
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry - I still can't find it in the vfaq. Nor can I find
'povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions' which is why I posted the
question. I assume now that the answer is no.
A simple 'yes' or 'no' would have done.
thanks
news:em2a7ucas61d8gajilhnm22bnc725n5ssr@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:40:50 +0200, "Soulstorm" <der### [at] gomailcoza>
> wrote:
> > Is it possible in POVRay to do true surface deformations?
> > i.e. not normal maps, but true deforms.
>
> look at http://news.povray.org/povray.general/22382/
>
> (is this answered in vfaq?)
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Jamie,
Your comment seems to be the most helpful of the lot. It set me thinking -
maybe some formulae for blobs along a sperical surface with some sine
deformations thrown in. hmm...back to work.
btw. for anyone reading this thread there is a nice tutorial on sine
deformations here :
http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/loop/povsi3e1.htm
thanks
-ss-
"Jamie Davison" <jam### [at] ntlworldcom> wrote in message
news:MPG.16df6892a2cc2c91989ae1@news.povray.org...
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:40:50 +0200, Soulstorm wrote...
> > Is it possible in POVRay to do true surface deformations?
> > i.e. not normal maps, but true deforms.
>
> If you knew the formula of the primitive and the formula for the
> deformation, I suspect you could use an isosurface, but as to exactly
> how. Well, that's beyond my skills.
>
> Bye for now,
> Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Soulstorm <der### [at] gomailcoza> wrote:
> I don't think it's the same problem as with bending...
> The normals are created with mathematical formulae, same with the
> primitives - I am sure with the right combination of these two it would be
> quite possible to do true surface deforms. The problem with bending is that
> the mathematics behind bending a mathematical abstract is supposedly very
> complex.
It *is* basically the same problem as in bending: You need to calculate
the intersection of a ray and a non-linearly transformed surface.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |