 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi folks,
Here's the source for my snowscape image.
Using aa of 0.1 it took ~5hr for a 640x480 image on a 350MHz PII
running NT.
Comments, queries, critiques, criticisms all welcome :-)
Bye for now,
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rmf.pov.txt' (5 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Michael Andrews wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> Here's the source for my snowscape image.
>
> Using aa of 0.1 it took ~5hr for a 640x480 image on a 350MHz PII
> running NT.
>
> Comments, queries, critiques, criticisms all welcome :-)
>
> Bye for now,
> Mike Andrews.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: rmf.pov
> rmf.pov Type: POV-Ray scene file
(application/x-unknown-content-type-POV-Ray.Scene)
> Encoding: base64
Thank you very much
--
*******************************
* they'll tell you what can't * mailto:ber### [at] iname com
* be done and why... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
* Then do it. *
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, thanks for posting this. I have been thinking about how to do this for a while -
my
excuse is "not enough time" :-], but I really hadn't figured it out yet.
James Crocker
"Jerome M. BERGER" wrote:
> Michael Andrews wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > Here's the source for my snowscape image.
> >
> > Using aa of 0.1 it took ~5hr for a 640x480 image on a 350MHz PII
> > running NT.
> >
> > Comments, queries, critiques, criticisms all welcome :-)
> >
> > Bye for now,
> > Mike Andrews.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Name: rmf.pov
> > rmf.pov Type: POV-Ray scene file
(application/x-unknown-content-type-POV-Ray.Scene)
> > Encoding: base64
>
> Thank you very much
>
> --
> *******************************
> * they'll tell you what can't * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
> * be done and why... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
> * Then do it. *
> *******************************
--
We're going back to the moon to stay. You can come too!
Find out more --> http://www.asi.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Taking it one level closer to reality...
How about a function that melts the snow a certain amount based on whether its in the
sunlight or in shadows? That would add a further touch of realism to an already very
cool
scene. You would need to figure out where the shadows were, and if so desired,
integrate
over a day to see how much sunlight fell on each area, or conversely how shaded an
area was
over a day. I suppose angle of incidence is important too, so slopes facing the sun
melt off
while slopes facing away don't melt as fast, even though they get sun most of the day
(just
not directly)....
Worth it? It might be more work than the value added to making it more "real".
James Crocker
Michael Andrews wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Here's the source for my snowscape image.
>
> Using aa of 0.1 it took ~5hr for a 640x480 image on a 350MHz PII
> running NT.
>
> Comments, queries, critiques, criticisms all welcome :-)
>
> Bye for now,
> Mike Andrews.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: rmf.pov
> rmf.pov Type: POV-Ray scene file
(application/x-unknown-content-type-POV-Ray.Scene)
> Encoding: base64
--
We're going back to the moon to stay. You can come too!
Find out more --> http://www.asi.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
