  | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
Read this for more details:
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA04-217A.html
POV-Ray 3.6 uses libpng 1.2.5, a vulnerable version.  This means a scene 
file using a PNG image map could potentially contain a malicious 
payload.
Given the vast number of applications that use libpng, this is scary...
-Ryan
 
 Post a reply to this message 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
Ryan Lamansky wrote:
> 
> This means a scene file using a PNG image map could potentially contain 
a malicious payload.
You should use correct formulations, this is nonsense as you wrote it. 
A broken PNG image can cause security problems when you use it in 
POV-Ray as an image map.
The whole thing isn't new, there have been similar problems with other 
support libraries before.  I really don't understand why people make so 
much fuzz about it.  If you had asked me a week ago to bet $1000 on 
libpng containing vulnerabilities or not the answer would have been 
completely clear.
Christoph
-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
 
 Post a reply to this message 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
This isn't a slam against POV-Ray, or anything like that.  I'm just in 
shock from the thought that an image file could hack me.
This vulnerability is relatively minor for POV-Ray, since so much user 
involvement is needed.  Things are a little different for web 
browsers...
-Ryan
 
 Post a reply to this message 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
From: Thorsten Froehlich 
Subject: Re: libpng Security Vulnerabilities 
Date:  5 Aug 2004 11:55:07 
Message: <4112585b@news.povray.org> 
 | 
 
 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
In article <cetgc0$8po$1@chho.imagico.de> , Christoph Hormann 
<chr### [at] gmx de>  wrote:
> The whole thing isn't new, there have been similar problems with other
> support libraries before.  I really don't understand why people make so
> much fuzz about it.  If you had asked me a week ago to bet $1000 on
> libpng containing vulnerabilities or not the answer would have been
> completely clear.
It still is today.  I would still bet $1000 that more will be found in the
future.  I would actually hold that for absolutely every non-trivial
software out there.
    Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trf de
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
 
 Post a reply to this message 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
Ryan Lamansky <Spa### [at] kardax com> wrote:
> I'm just in shock from the thought that an image file could hack me.
  It's much easier to give you a trojan as an SDL script than with
a png.
-- 
plane{-x+y,-1pigment{bozo color_map{[0rgb x][1rgb x+y]}turbulence 1}}
sphere{0,2pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission 1density{spherical
density_map{[0rgb 0][.5rgb<1,.5>][1rgb 1]}turbulence.9}}}scale
<1,1,3>hollow}text{ttf"timrom""Warp".1,0translate<-1,-.1,2>}//  - Warp -
 
 Post a reply to this message 
 | 
  | 
 |   | 
 |   | 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 |   |