Today I came across this link for some free Windows RCS software.  I've been
using it for a few hours and it seems pretty neat.  It is compatible with
GNU RCS, and integrates very well with MS VC++ (and MS Word, for that
matter).  In fact, I think the back end of the thing is GPL complient, while
the windows interface proprietary.

Anyway, it is freeware for single-user systems.

http://www.componentsoftware.com/csrcs/

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message

Nathan Kopp wrote:
> 
> Today I came across this link for some free Windows RCS software.  I've been
> using it for a few hours and it seems pretty neat.  It is compatible with
> GNU RCS, and integrates very well with MS VC++ (and MS Word, for that
> matter).  In fact, I think the back end of the thing is GPL complient, while
> the windows interface proprietary.
> 
> Anyway, it is freeware for single-user systems.
> 
> http://www.componentsoftware.com/csrcs/

Yes, we use it in our company. But for multi-user it is not free, but
very
reasonably priced ($70 per seat). Drawback is, it can't handle branches
automatically, but you can always call the command line version of rcs
to
handle that.

Markus
-- 

 Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens

Post a reply to this message

Markus Becker wrote:

> Nathan Kopp wrote:

> >

> > Today I came across this link for some free Windows RCS software.  I've been

> > using it for a few hours and it seems pretty neat.  It is compatible with

> > GNU RCS, and integrates very well with MS VC++ (and MS Word, for that

> > matter).  In fact, I think the back end of the thing is GPL complient, while

> > the windows interface proprietary.

> >

> > Anyway, it is freeware for single-user systems.

> >

> > http://www.componentsoftware.com/csrcs/

>

> Yes, we use it in our company. But for multi-user it is not free, but

> very

> reasonably priced ($70 per seat). Drawback is, it can't handle branches

> automatically, but you can always call the command line version of rcs

> to

> handle that.

>

> Markus

> --


>  Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens


Maybe I missed a part of the discussion. But why not use CVS/WinCVS. It handles
braches, is available on all major platforms, well tested and distributed under
the GPL. Furthermore there are Web-interfaces and it has a clean client server
architecture. I've used it for several years and never had any problems with it.

Peter

Post a reply to this message

Peter Hopfgartner <hop### [at] rolmailnet> wrote...
> Markus Becker wrote:
>
> > Nathan Kopp wrote:
> > >
> > > Today I came across this link for some free Windows RCS software.
I've been
> > > using it for a few hours and it seems pretty neat.  It is compatible
with
> > > GNU RCS, and integrates very well with MS VC++ (and MS Word, for that
> > > matter).  In fact, I think the back end of the thing is GPL complient,
while
> > > the windows interface proprietary.
> > >
> > > Anyway, it is freeware for single-user systems.
> > >
> > > http://www.componentsoftware.com/csrcs/
> >
> > Yes, we use it in our company. But for multi-user it is not free, but
> > very
> > reasonably priced ($70 per seat). Drawback is, it can't handle branches
> > automatically, but you can always call the command line version of rcs
> > to
> > handle that.
> >
> > Markus
> > --

> >  Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens
>
> Maybe I missed a part of the discussion. But why not use CVS/WinCVS. It
handles
> braches, is available on all major platforms, well tested and distributed
under
> the GPL. Furthermore there are Web-interfaces and it has a clean client
server
> architecture. I've used it for several years and never had any problems
with it.
>
> Peter
>

It's because CS-RCS implements SCC, which means it integrates well with MS
Visual C++ (which I use a lot).  Someone also wrote a plug-in to integrate
it with Delphi (which I also use a lot).  Basically, I don't have to leave
my development environment to check in/out my revisions.  On the other hand,
someone is developing a SCC interface for WinCVS (see
http://members.home.net/preston/cvsscc.html), so I might switch soon.

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message

"Nathan Kopp" <Nat### [at] Koppcom> wrote:
> Peter Hopfgartner <hop### [at] rolmailnet> wrote...
> > Markus Becker wrote:
> >
> > > Nathan Kopp wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today I came across this link for some free Windows RCS software.
> I've been
> > > > using it for a few hours and it seems pretty neat.  It is compatible
> with
> > > > GNU RCS, and integrates very well with MS VC++ (and MS Word, for that
> > > > matter).  In fact, I think the back end of the thing is GPL complient,
> while
> > > > the windows interface proprietary.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, it is freeware for single-user systems.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.componentsoftware.com/csrcs/
> > >
> > > Yes, we use it in our company. But for multi-user it is not free, but
> > > very
> > > reasonably priced ($70 per seat). Drawback is, it can't handle branches
> > > automatically, but you can always call the command line version of rcs
> > > to
> > > handle that.
> > >
> > > Markus
> > > --

> > >  Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens
> >
> > Maybe I missed a part of the discussion. But why not use CVS/WinCVS. It
> handles
> > braches, is available on all major platforms, well tested and distributed
> under
> > the GPL. Furthermore there are Web-interfaces and it has a clean client
> server
> > architecture. I've used it for several years and never had any problems
> with it.
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> It's because CS-RCS implements SCC, which means it integrates well with MS
> Visual C++ (which I use a lot).  Someone also wrote a plug-in to integrate
> it with Delphi (which I also use a lot).  Basically, I don't have to leave
> my development environment to check in/out my revisions.  On the other hand,
> someone is developing a SCC interface for WinCVS (see
> http://members.home.net/preston/cvsscc.html), so I might switch soon.
>
> -Nathan


Hello Nathan,

can you tell me link where i can know in more detail about CVS interface
with Delphi

murugan

Post a reply to this message