 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
FYI.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58227
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 09.04.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Bald Eagle:
>
> FYI.
>
> http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58227
Make sure to read the whole article, not just the headlines.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 10.04.2018 um 07:59 schrieb clipka:
> Am 09.04.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Bald Eagle:
>>
>> FYI.
>>
>> http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58227
>
> Make sure to read the whole article, not just the headlines.
Or, better yet, read the original Vice article they're quoting:
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/wj7x9w/google-chrome-scans-files-on-your-windows-computer-chrome-cleanup-tool
As for the Information Liberation article, don't expect impartiality
from the author; in the article, they write about Google (emphasis added):
"This is the most dangerous company in the world and THEY'RE DOING
EVERYTHING in their power to CRUSH MY SITE and others who go against the
narrative."
Regardless of whether or not that statement may or may not be true, they
clearly have a personal stake in this.
I like the Vice article concluding that anyone that paranoid about
Google should really not be using their browser in the first place.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/04/2018 20:13, Bald Eagle wrote:
>
> FYI.
>
> http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58227
>
>
>
One more step on the path to 1984.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43751276
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-4-2018 12:52, Stephen wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 20:13, Bald Eagle wrote:
>>
>> FYI.
>>
>> http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58227
>>
>>
>>
>
> One more step on the path to 1984.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43751276
>
And Room 101 is probably in existence already.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2018-04-08 02:23 AM (-4), clipka wrote:
> As for the Information Liberation article, don't expect impartiality
> from the author; in the article, they write about Google (emphasis added):
>
> "This is the most dangerous company in the world and THEY'RE DOING
> EVERYTHING in their power to CRUSH MY SITE and others who go against the
> narrative."
>
> Regardless of whether or not that statement may or may not be true, they
> clearly have a personal stake in this.
The videos featuring Tucker Carlson and Breitbart are massive hints to
me that I shouldn't be taking this all too seriously.
Also, he thinks an employee of a capitalist behemoth like The Google is
"a far-left lunatic." I did take a look at Schuh's Twitter feed. It's
pretty standard for progressives in the USA. Only far *right* lunatics
would consider it extreme, exactly the sort of people who don't have a
solid grip on reality.
One thing to keep in mind is that right wing snowflakes are known to
bellyache about their views being suppressed, even as they bask in
mainstream media coverage and their view counts skyrocket. Case in
point, Diamond and Silk.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
