 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain <aze### [at] qwerty org> wrote:
> > On 21/05/2011 7:49 PM, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> >> Why does this look so much like a render? The moon looks so huge and the
> >> sun so small...
> >>
> >> http://www.marlothparkhonoraryrangers.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/sunset.jpg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Render.
> > What Warp said and for the crescent to be in the position it is in. The
> > image would need to be taken at the equator and there is no lens flare.
> >
> Also, the sun would be the same apparent size as the moon.
This image has that "Terragen look". Here's the original on the author's
website:
http://www.gatetonowhere.de/gallery/details.php?image_id=63
Rob.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
photoshop
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I'm not sure you would get water like that at the North Pole either...
Yeah. Global warming is pretty bad, but I don't think it's yet *that*
bad. (Although in a few decades, who knows...)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> photoshop
Since when has Terragen been called "photoshop"?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Was anybody else's first reaction "does the JPEG have an EXIF tag?"?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > photoshop
>
> Since when has Terragen been called "photoshop"?
didn't look like Terragen, just an edited photo.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:14:33 -0400, nemesis wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> > photoshop
>>
>> Since when has Terragen been called "photoshop"?
>
> didn't look like Terragen, just an edited photo.
Doesn't look anything like a photo to me, as others pointed out, apart
from the sizes being completely wrong no matter where you are in the
world, there are other significant issues with the image that make it a
physical impossibility.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/21/11 20:49, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> Why does this look so much like a render? The moon looks so huge and the
> sun so small...
It would be nice if someone could take a photo of the moon and venus in
this constellation…
Lars R.
PS: I don't know the angular size of venus by mind, who does?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/05/2011 13:59, Loki Doki wrote:
> PS: I don't know the angular size of venus by mind, who does?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Venus+angular+size
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:14:33 -0400, nemesis wrote:
>
> > Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> >> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >> > photoshop
> >>
> >> Since when has Terragen been called "photoshop"?
> >
> > didn't look like Terragen, just an edited photo.
>
> Doesn't look anything like a photo to me, as others pointed out, apart
> from the sizes being completely wrong no matter where you are in the
> world, there are other significant issues with the image that make it a
> physical impossibility.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/northpole.asp
amusing. You search for "north pole sunset" in both google and flickr and
several copies of that image come up.
I don't see any particular "significant issues with the image that make it a
physical impossibility" with it though, apart from the sizes, which could be
edited. Specially in the face of HDR photography making photos look like CG,
like this one with 3 min exposure:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelpixcomau/5452674118/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
