 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 19-6-2014 8:27, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 19/06/2014 07:43, Nekar Xenos a écrit :
>
>> Alternatively afaik SVG supports feathered dropshadows and rounded boxes. I
>> think SVG could be the future of design because it seems to support just about
>> everything needed for print and web.
>
>
> svg has even draft about multipage... which, with the ability to use CSS
> at top of svg file, might or might not be a good thing.
>
> In formating of the page, there is already the World vs North-America
> (A4 vs US letter). Either you designed your template to only use the
> common area, dropping the margin (width 210 vs 216 mm, height 297 vs 279
> mm, so 6 mm & 18 mm of white..), or you didn't and the change of paper
> becomes "interesting" (truncated text, or repaginated with references
> becoming wrong...)
Huh, I though current paper sizes were IPad, IPad mini, IPhone,
1600x1200,1280x1024,..., and whatever the android phones/tablets use.
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 01:43:15 -0400, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> I wouldn't compare the learning curve to Blender
> at all, InDesign is a lot easier.
The idea in the comparison (on my part) was not to say that they're
equally difficult, but that the UI seems to get in the way (at least with
FrameMaker, I've no direct experience with InDesign) until you understand
the workflow that it's designed for. I've used a number of Adobe
products over the years, and have found that to be the case.
IOW, it's not about "this is more difficult than that" but that it is
important to learn the tool, and there is a learning curve before one
becomes familiar enough to be very productive.
Jim
--
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 19/06/2014 4:20 PM, andrel wrote:
>
> Huh, I though current paper sizes were IPad, IPad mini, IPhone,
> 1600x1200,1280x1024,..., and whatever the android phones/tablets use.
>
So cynical for one so young. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
I solemnly promise to kick the next angle, I see.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19
> IOW, it's not about "this is more difficult than that" but that it is
> important to learn the tool, and there is a learning curve before one
> becomes familiar enough to be very productive.
>
> Jim
>
True. It did take some time to figure things out.
The documentation and Google helped a lot
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
