 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle <evi### [at] kosher hotmailcom> wrote:
> Will Disney rape our childhoods?
Just because Disney owns Lucasfilms doesn't means that Lucasfilms (or
George Lucas himself) ceases to exist and is removed from the
decision-making and creation process. I bet not much will change.
In fact, I'd say it would be *better* if Lucas were removed from
the production of the movie. He has clearly lost the ball, so any
subsequent movie might *improve* if it were made by someone else.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:26:30 -0400, Warp wrote:
> In fact, I'd say it would be *better* if Lucas were removed from the
> production of the movie. He has clearly lost the ball, so any subsequent
> movie might *improve* if it were made by someone else.
What they say is that he will be a 'creative consultant', but the film is
being produced by someone who was a VP at Lucasfilm IIRC.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/2/2012 6:26 AM, Warp wrote:
> In fact, I'd say it would be *better* if Lucas were removed from
> the production of the movie. He has clearly lost the ball, so any
> subsequent movie might *improve* if it were made by someone else.
Tales handed down to me reveal that between Episodes 5 and 6 the
partnership between Lucas and the other guy behind the series came to an
end. It would certainly explain why TESB was the best of the whole series.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
