![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 17/09/2012 04:52 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I suggested contract work before, and I'll suggest it again. It's a way
> to get the bills paid.
I don't get that.
Currently, I am unemployed, which is a problem. It means I have to waste
endless hours of my life vainly searching for employment. But
eventually, I will [hopefully] find a job, at which point I no longer
have that particular problem.
"Contact works" basically means "being /permanently/ unemployed". It
means you spend two or three weeks per year getting paid, and the rest
of the entire year desperately looking for your next contact. There's no
way I could deal with that level of stress. (Not to mention the extreme
financial problems...) I really don't get why anybody would voluntarily
work that way.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> On 17/09/2012 04:52 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> > I suggested contract work before, and I'll suggest it again. It's a way
> > to get the bills paid.
>
> I don't get that.
>
> Currently, I am unemployed, which is a problem. It means I have to waste
> endless hours of my life vainly searching for employment. But
> eventually, I will [hopefully] find a job, at which point I no longer
> have that particular problem.
>
This is the 21st Century going on the 18th Century. You may have to wait until
situation going away soon. (I hope that it does, though)
> "Contact works" basically means "being /permanently/ unemployed". It
> means you spend two or three weeks per year getting paid, and the rest
> of the entire year desperately looking for your next contact. There's no
> way I could deal with that level of stress. (Not to mention the extreme
> financial problems...) I really don't get why anybody would voluntarily
> work that way.
As usual you express opinions that are based in a reality of your own.
I have been contracting for almost twenty years. True I have had periods when I
found it hard to get a suitable contract but the pay rate for contractors is
about a month before my contract is due to expire before I start looking. Any
earlier than that and your notice period is too long for an employer to wait.
there is little real job security and I can decide to take two or three months
off if I feel like it.
But if you want job security why not try the civil service. Ours have enough IT
blunders to need decent staff.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 2012-09-19 05:35, Orchid Win7 v1 a écrit :
> "Contact works" basically means "being /permanently/ unemployed". It
> means you spend two or three weeks per year getting paid, and the rest
> of the entire year desperately looking for your next contact. There's no
> way I could deal with that level of stress. (Not to mention the extreme
> financial problems...) I really don't get why anybody would voluntarily
> work that way.
The contractors I have worked with were usually on 1-year contracts,
that our management would renew until they reached the limit (a
contractor that has been doing the same thing for 3 years has to be
offered a permanent position since you can't justify it as being
temporary anymore). Most would refuse the offer since they prefered
the liberty of being able to change jobs whenever they wanted.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 19/09/2012 02:26 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
> The contractors I have worked with were usually on 1-year contracts,
Like I say, finding /one/ job is hard enough. Having to find a job every
12 months would just be intractably difficult.
> Most would refuse the offer since they prefered the
> liberty of being able to change jobs whenever they wanted.
This could make sense, if we were in an employee's market. But currently
we are in an employer's market.
(Currently the market is flooded with people looking for work. That
gives employers the power to be very fussy about who they hire.)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:29:35 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 17/09/2012 04:52 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> You've got a severance package, don't wait for it to run out. Start
>> now and don't give up.
>
> Now? I started several weeks ago. :-P (I've already been to 2 interviews
> this summer, remember? That equals my previous record of 2 interviews
> this human lifetime...)
The outplacement service I was given access to with the layoff said that
one should be doing 4-5 interviews a week IIRC, and sending 20-30 CVs a
week. It's all about numbers.
Now, myself, I haven't done that kind of volume myself. And 16 months
later, I'm still looking for a full-time position. But I'm also being
very picky about who I even apply to - and since I have contract work
bringing in income, I can afford to be a little more picky.
>> If I break a leg or am in an auto accident, I'm pretty much screwed.
>
> Uh, yeah. It must be great living in a country where if you have a
> health problem but you're not rich enough to pay a doctor, they just
> leave you to die... (What is this, the 5th century or something?!)
Well, no, they don't leave you to die (though there are some who would be
perfectly happy to do so). You go to the emergency room and get the
minimum care necessary to keep you alive - and then you end up paying for
anything else until you go bankrupt.
Fortunately, the new health care law addresses part of that problem -
along with lifetime maximum coverage (without which, even people with
coverage can/have gone bankrupt if they contract something that requires
a lifetime of expensive meds and treatments).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:35:50 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 17/09/2012 04:52 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I suggested contract work before, and I'll suggest it again. It's a
>> way to get the bills paid.
>
> I don't get that.
>
> Currently, I am unemployed, which is a problem. It means I have to waste
> endless hours of my life vainly searching for employment. But
> eventually, I will [hopefully] find a job, at which point I no longer
> have that particular problem.
>
> "Contact works" basically means "being /permanently/ unemployed". It
> means you spend two or three weeks per year getting paid, and the rest
> of the entire year desperately looking for your next contact. There's no
> way I could deal with that level of stress. (Not to mention the extreme
> financial problems...) I really don't get why anybody would voluntarily
> work that way.
Yeah, two or three weeks getting paid.
Oh, wait, no - my current contract started in July and runs through the
end of December. Unless I can't count, that's more than 2-3 weeks.
And it's not the only one I've done.
The money is very good (but it's all pre-tax, so here in the US, we have
to submit a quarterly estimate and pay our taxes with that estimate).
So as is fairly common, you base your feeling on how something works from
a completely unrealistic view of how it actually works, and then decide
that it's not for you.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:29:52 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 19/09/2012 02:26 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
>> The contractors I have worked with were usually on 1-year contracts,
>
> Like I say, finding /one/ job is hard enough. Having to find a job every
> 12 months would just be intractably difficult.
In my experience this past year, it's been easier. Partly because
contract employees don't count as "head count", which means it comes out
of a different budget.
A contract is also becoming a more and more common way for auditioning
for a permanent position.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:30:22 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 18/09/2012 06:37 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> I don’t think that taking a menial job is a good idea. For a start it
>> would limit your time looking for a suitable job. It would not do your
>> self esteem any good either. You are not hurting for money ATM and you
>> don’t have the pressure of a mortgage or supporting a wife and kids. So
>> make looking for a suitable job your job.
>
> This.
Then *do* it.
And don't cite your two interviews and say that you are. That's not
spending 8 hours a day working on finding something, networking with
people, and considering all options carefully, and weighing the pros and
cons (for example, a job that has a commute might be offset by a
significant pay increase or a willingness on the part of the prospective
employer to let you work from home).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:32:36 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>> What I would say is don't get complacent just because you have
>>> severance to cover you through the next few months. Keep looking,
>>> You'll find something.
>>
>> Yes - this * 1000. Consider the severance as "my old employer is
>> paying me to find a new job" and treat it accordingly.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> Office hours are the best time to contact people who can get you in for
>> a new job.
>
> Yeah, it makes a change to be able to just phone people, without having
> to find somewhere I can hide so I can make the call without
> interruptions...
Here in the US, it's possible to reserve a conference room at the local
library. You might try that if that's something that's available in the
UK.
Or the local job centre might have a place for making private calls.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> I don’t think that taking a menial job is a good idea. For a start it
>> would limit your time looking for a suitable job. It would not do your
>> self esteem any good either. You are not hurting for money ATM and you
>> don’t have the pressure of a mortgage or supporting a wife and kids. So
>> make looking for a suitable job your job.
>
> This.
Also you're lucky that you have a bit of money, so you'll be able to
start renting accommodation straight away to start your job. A lot of
people can't do that because you might not get your first pay check
until you've been working for 3-6 weeks.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |