![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 27/08/2012 11:24 AM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> OK, so I'm currently looking for some VM software I can run on my home PC.
>
> At work, I use VMware Workstation. Which works vastly better than
> anything else I've seen, but it's expensive. Really expensive. I just
OK, so today I bought VMware Workstation. Because, hey, I get paid now. ;-)
At work I had VMware Workstation 6.5.4. However, apparently the latest
version is 9.0.0 - which, as it turns out, looks much more pretty. And
there's a few minor irritations that are now gone. This is much better! :-D
On the other hand, sadly they /still/ haven't added an option to still
show disk indicator lights in fullscreen mode. Nor have they added a CPU
light. There's lights for every other resource, but not CPU. So I
honestly can't tell if my VM has crashed, or is just compute-bound...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
> On the other hand, sadly they /still/ haven't added an option to still
> show disk indicator lights in fullscreen mode. Nor have they added a CPU
> light. There's lights for every other resource, but not CPU. So I
> honestly can't tell if my VM has crashed, or is just compute-bound...
What would be the difference to check how much CPU the Vmware
Workstation's process is using?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 15/10/2012 04:22 PM, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>> On the other hand, sadly they /still/ haven't added an option to still
>> show disk indicator lights in fullscreen mode. Nor have they added a CPU
>> light. There's lights for every other resource, but not CPU. So I
>> honestly can't tell if my VM has crashed, or is just compute-bound...
>
> What would be the difference to check how much CPU the Vmware
> Workstation's process is using?
It's just annoying having to constantly flick between the VMware window
and the Process Explorer window to try to see what the thing is doing.
By contrast, disk and network activity are nicely displayed right there.
(Unless it's in full-screen mode...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
> It's just annoying having to constantly flick between the VMware window
> and the Process Explorer window to try to see what the thing is doing.
> By contrast, disk and network activity are nicely displayed right there.
> (Unless it's in full-screen mode...)
>
Well yes, that's true. OTOH you could finally buy yourself also a decent
monitor and put those 2 windows side by side ;).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 15/10/2012 06:28 PM, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>> It's just annoying having to constantly flick between the VMware window
>> and the Process Explorer window to try to see what the thing is doing.
>> By contrast, disk and network activity are nicely displayed right there.
>> (Unless it's in full-screen mode...)
>>
>
> Well yes, that's true. OTOH you could finally buy yourself also a decent
> monitor and put those 2 windows side by side ;).
Not unless I also buy myself a bigger desk to put them on, and maybe a
bigger room to fit the bigger desk into. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
> Not unless I also buy myself a bigger desk to put them on, and maybe a
> bigger room to fit the bigger desk into. ;-)
That's not a bad plan. But don't hold your breath, it might take couple
of months ;).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 16/10/2012 16:22, Eero Ahonen a écrit :
> Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>> Not unless I also buy myself a bigger desk to put them on, and maybe a
>> bigger room to fit the bigger desk into. ;-)
>
> That's not a bad plan. But don't hold your breath, it might take couple
> of months ;).
You're thinking too small.
Screen / Desk / Room... what about House instead ?
Make your day, buy a city!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |