On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:04 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 17/05/2012 7:01 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> It was a highly entertaining interview.  Though I'm not sure that I
>> believed his "remorse" over the Phil Daoust song (given that he
>> released an album with that on it last year IIRC).
> 
> I had to look it up having never heard of Tim Minchin.

Oh, I thought you had originally mentioned him to me (along with a few 
other people who did).

> Oh! For the days of sail ships when it took six months to travel between
> GB and Oz.
> 
>  From the clip I heard I don't think he is very good.
> 
> http://www.giantbomb.com/forums/off-topic/31/tim-minchin-versus-phil-
daoust/411441/

I've found most of his stuff to be quite funny.  His lullaby is very 
good, if only because it says the things you'd never dare say. :)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 5/17/2012 1:11, Invisible wrote:
>> Yeah, I had a problem with those questions too, because while I'm a
>> musician (inactive, but I played for more than a decade and have formal
>> music theory training as well as performance training), I can't sing
>> worth a damn. My voice has a range of maybe a minor fifth. :)
>
> My voice has a range of an octave and a half, maybe more if I use falsetto
> as well.
>
> None of which compensates for the fact that I can't reliably sing in tune,
> my throat hurts after a minute or two, and I'm constantly out of breath.
> Also, my voice just sounds awful. :-P

I'm betting you'd improve if you actually took some lessons.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."

Post a reply to this message

On 17/05/2012 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:04 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I had to look it up having never heard of Tim Minchin.
>
> Oh, I thought you had originally mentioned him to me (along with a few
> other people who did).
>

You're talking to someone who thinks "Clue" is cutting edge. :-P

>
> I've found most of his stuff to be quite funny.  His lullaby is very
> good, if only because it says the things you'd never dare say. :)
>

I will take your word on it.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

>> My voice has a range of an octave and a half, maybe more if I use
>> falsetto
>> as well.
>>
>> None of which compensates for the fact that I can't reliably sing in
>> tune,
>> my throat hurts after a minute or two, and I'm constantly out of breath.
>> Also, my voice just sounds awful. :-P
>
> I'm betting you'd improve if you actually took some lessons.

Yeah, you're probably right about that. Trouble is, I'd never have the 
nerve to actually sing out loud in front of somebody else... o_O

Post a reply to this message

On 17/05/2012 06:12 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012 09:12:49 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>
>> It took be about an hour to tune the violin when I first brought it
>> home. As soon as I let go on the tuning peg, it would instantly go slack
>> again. Took me ages to make it stick. Not sure if worn out or just
>> poorly made in the first place...
>
> Sounds like it's worn to me.  Peg Dope (which IIRC is the actual product
> name) is supposed to help with that.

Possibly doesn't help that I've never tuned a violin in my life.

Obviously, having your instrument correctly tuned is crucially 
important. So at school, the teacher always did that for us.

> Replacing the strings is easy.  I wouldn't pay someone to do it, just buy
> a set of Dominant or similar and replace them one by one.

Yeah, I already read that you shouldn't remove all the strings at once. 
I wonder how many other gotchas there are? Apparently it's also fairly 
important to have the strings properly routed through the pegbox... In 
all, I figure I should probably leave this one to the professionals. It 
probably won't even cost that much.

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 18 May 2012 08:56:54 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 17/05/2012 8:14 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:43:04 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> I had to look it up having never heard of Tim Minchin.
>>
>> Oh, I thought you had originally mentioned him to me (along with a few
>> other people who did).
>>
>>
> You're talking to someone who thinks "Clue" is cutting edge. :-P

LOL. :)  BTW, I was shocked (shocked, I say!) that there was no Mornington 
Crescent in the last series.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 18 May 2012 09:05:31 +0100, Invisible wrote:

>> Sounds like it's worn to me.  Peg Dope (which IIRC is the actual
>> product name) is supposed to help with that.
> 
> Possibly doesn't help that I've never tuned a violin in my life.
> 
> Obviously, having your instrument correctly tuned is crucially
> important. So at school, the teacher always did that for us.

Seems like a poor excuse for a teacher, then.  The point of playing in 
school isn't to sound good, but to learn how to play (which includes 
tuning the instrument).

>> Replacing the strings is easy.  I wouldn't pay someone to do it, just
>> buy a set of Dominant or similar and replace them one by one.
> 
> Yeah, I already read that you shouldn't remove all the strings at once.
> I wonder how many other gotchas there are? Apparently it's also fairly
> important to have the strings properly routed through the pegbox... In
> all, I figure I should probably leave this one to the professionals. It
> probably won't even cost that much.

Probably not, if you've never done this before.  But I'm surprised that 
you haven't, as I recall you say you played for years.  But given your 
above comment that you've never tuned a violin before, it seems that your 
self-described "suckiness" at playing is attributable in a HUGE part to 
having a crap teacher who didn't actually teach you anything about 
playing the violin beyond "put your fingers here" and "move the bow like 
this".

Jim

Post a reply to this message

>> Possibly doesn't help that I've never tuned a violin in my life.
>>
>> Obviously, having your instrument correctly tuned is crucially
>> important. So at school, the teacher always did that for us.
>
> Seems like a poor excuse for a teacher, then.  The point of playing in
> school isn't to sound good, but to learn how to play (which includes
> tuning the instrument).

Well, you know, we're talking about 9 year old kids here.

> Probably not, if you've never done this before.  But I'm surprised that
> you haven't, as I recall you say you played for years.

I played for about 2 years, total. And that was 20 years ago...

> But given your
> above comment that you've never tuned a violin before, it seems that your
> self-described "suckiness" at playing is attributable in a HUGE part to
> having a crap teacher who didn't actually teach you anything about
> playing the violin beyond "put your fingers here" and "move the bow like
> this".

Perhaps.

Then again, the violin is a very hard instrument to play. Basically, 
it's /sensitive/. That means that in experienced hands, you can do all 
this really expressive playing, which is what the violin is famous for 
of course. But because it's /sensitive/, it also means that in 
inexperienced hands, every slightly glitch is magnified drastically, and 
it sounds plain AWFUL! >_<

So far, I basically haven't used the E-string at all. The pressure of 
the bow on the string seems to be enough to put it out of tune. And as 
soon as I put a finger on it, it becomes almost completely mute.

Also, I have bruised fingertips now. :-/

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 18 May 2012 21:47:45 +0100, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:

>>> Possibly doesn't help that I've never tuned a violin in my life.
>>>
>>> Obviously, having your instrument correctly tuned is crucially
>>> important. So at school, the teacher always did that for us.
>>
>> Seems like a poor excuse for a teacher, then.  The point of playing in
>> school isn't to sound good, but to learn how to play (which includes
>> tuning the instrument).
> 
> Well, you know, we're talking about 9 year old kids here.

I don't remember precisely, but ISTR that when I was 9, I had at that 
point been taught how to tune my instrument.

>> Probably not, if you've never done this before.  But I'm surprised that
>> you haven't, as I recall you say you played for years.
> 
> I played for about 2 years, total. And that was 20 years ago...

See, the impression you gave about this previously was that you had many 
years' experience playing.  2 years isn't enough to get a lot of 
expertise in playing an instrument.  You said you sucked at it.  You 
didn't say that you only played for 2 years when you were < 11 years old.

That makes a difference.

> Then again, the violin is a very hard instrument to play. 

It certainly takes more than 2 years practice as a prepubescent teen to 
get any competence at it, yes.  (I played from the time I was 9 until I 
was about 20 or 21).

If it were /easy/, then everyone could play like Itzhak Perlman.

> Basically,
> it's /sensitive/. That means that in experienced hands, you can do all
> this really expressive playing, which is what the violin is famous for
> of course. But because it's /sensitive/, it also means that in
> inexperienced hands, every slightly glitch is magnified drastically, and
> it sounds plain AWFUL! >_<

You expect to get instant expertise.  It takes years (more than *2*) to 
get to that level of playing.

> So far, I basically haven't used the E-string at all. The pressure of
> the bow on the string seems to be enough to put it out of tune. And as
> soon as I put a finger on it, it becomes almost completely mute.

That tells me that the pegs are definitely not right for the peg holes, 
and you should get someone to take a look at it.

> Also, I have bruised fingertips now. :-/

Yep, that'll happen until you get callouses on your fingertips.  That's 
part of the reason I haven't played in several years - I don't have those 
callouses, but I have the dexterity, and it does hurt to play.  Feels 
like I'm cutting into my fingertips with a dull knife.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 18/05/2012 8:57 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> LOL.:)   BTW, I was shocked (shocked, I say!)

Bzzz! Repetition.

> that there was no Mornington Crescent in the last series.

I did not really notice. It's one song to the tune of another that I 
look forward to.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message