POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : What do we need The Onion for anymore? Server Time
29 Jul 2024 12:16:22 EDT (-0400)
  What do we need The Onion for anymore? (Message 21 to 24 of 24)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: What do we need The Onion for anymore?
Date: 3 Apr 2012 10:18:33
Message: <4f7b06b9$1@news.povray.org>
On 03/04/2012 2:36 PM, Alain wrote:
>>
>> The coelacanth is not a fossil. It's 6000 years old, just like all other
>> creatures.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>
> I though that the creation was dated to 5000 years... :P

Nope, Ussher deduced that the first day of creation began at nightfall 
preceding Sunday, October 23, 4004 BC.
And only one Angel can dance on the head of a pin. (They are quite 
territorial, you know) ;-)


-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: What do we need The Onion for anymore?
Date: 3 Apr 2012 13:07:02
Message: <4F7B2E37.2030402@gmail.com>
On 31-3-2012 17:43, Warp wrote:
>    This is *exactly* the type of spoof news article you could expect to
> find on The Onion:
>
>
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/03/26/war-on-words-nyc-dept-of-education-wants-50-forbidden-words-removed-from-standardized-tests/
>
>    The scary thing? It's not on The Onion. It's real.
>
>    The Onion can stop doing satirical spoofs. They could become an accurate
> news source, and not much would change.
>
>    Every time I think my faith in humanity is gone, the stupidity of the
> world somehow succeeds in surpassing itself.
>

Let's be a bit more realistic about that. It is not that these words 
will be forbidden in any publication in NY.

What apparently is the case in this article is that someone pointed out 
that if you want to test e.g. comprehensive reading the subject of the 
test my matter.
If you have a text where cancer plays a role and the person that is 
tested just lost a close relative to this disease, it is quite likely 
that this person will perform below their capacities. Hence in this case 
the test is not only measuring what it should.
A similar case can be made for some of the other words.

-- 
tip: do not run in an unknown place when it is too dark to see the 
floor, unless you prefer to not use uppercase.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: What do we need The Onion for anymore?
Date: 7 Apr 2012 12:01:01
Message: <4f8064bd@news.povray.org>
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>   I really wonder if they want to ban the word "atheist" as well.

  It reminds me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdnWwlZCsSw

  I think the technical term for that is dehumanization.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: What do we need The Onion for anymore?
Date: 22 May 2012 20:14:15
Message: <4fbc2bd7$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/31/2012 10:43 AM, Warp wrote:
>    This is *exactly* the type of spoof news article you could expect to
> find on The Onion:
>
>
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/03/26/war-on-words-nyc-dept-of-education-wants-50-forbidden-words-removed-from-standardized-tests/
>
>    The scary thing? It's not on The Onion. It's real.
>
>    The Onion can stop doing satirical spoofs. They could become an accurate
> news source, and not much would change.
>
>    Every time I think my faith in humanity is gone, the stupidity of the
> world somehow succeeds in surpassing itself.

"In the beginning, God made idiots.  That was for practice.  Then He 
made school boards." -- Mark Twain

That quote comes from over a century ago, too.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.