 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I'm quite sure that I wouldn't like that job, being bored and having to be
> attentive.
I think he had something like an hour or more to react to the problem, and
only if the automated systems didn't kick in. But yes, it sounded like a
pretty boring job. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
unable to read this, even at arm's length."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:35:40 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I'm quite sure that I wouldn't like that job, being bored and having to be
>> attentive.
>
>I think he had something like an hour or more to react to the problem, and
>only if the automated systems didn't kick in. But yes, it sounded like a
>pretty boring job. :-)
High Pressure job, then :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> To this end, I spent 2 hours and 20 minutes on the phone to a guy in the
>> USA while he dithered and dallied over what to do about the problem. (My
>> repeated cries of "I really need to leave now" and "I've got an
>> appointment to get to" and "can't we sort this out tomorrow?" fell on
>> deaf ears.) I wouldn't mind, but I spent most of the time just sitting
>> around listening to the guy muttering to himself and chatting to his
>> collegues about the weather.
>
> Not to mention the three hours you spent updating us about how
> unproductive
> your day was...
LOL!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
