 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
...running WinAmp for over 2 hours decoding Ogg Vorbis in realtime, and
seeing that it used a total of 4 seconds of CPU time.
(That's one impressive inverse MDCT!)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> ...running WinAmp for over 2 hours decoding Ogg Vorbis in realtime, and
> seeing that it used a total of 4 seconds of CPU time.
>
> (That's one impressive inverse MDCT!)
>
!
That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
using <10% CPU time!
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
> using <10% CPU time!
Well, when somebody comes up with the equivilent of the Fast Fourier
Transform, maybe... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
> using <10% CPU time!
If we could, we would increase the detail on the scene to reach 100%
again :) YKYHBRTTLW...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmail isthebestcom> wrote:
> YKYHBRTTLW...
YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
....Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> YKYHBRTTLW...
>
> YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
You Know You Have Been RayTracing Too Long
When You Know When You Know (?) You Have
Been RayTracing Too Long W... M...
Err... Explain?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> YKYHBRTTLW...
>>
>> YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
>
> You Know You Have Been RayTracing Too Long
> When You Know When You Know (?) You Have
> Been RayTracing Too Long W... M...
>
> Err... Explain?
You haven't been raytracing long enough.
You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you know
you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Err... Explain?
>
> You haven't been raytracing long enough.
>
> You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you know
> you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
Good job :)
> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
What's that?
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> Err... Explain?
>>
>> You haven't been raytracing long enough.
>>
>> You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you
>> know you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
>
> Good job :)
>
>> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
>
> What's that?
>
Thread That Shall Not Be Named
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
> > Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> >> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
> >
> > What's that?
> >
>
> Thread That Shall Not Be Named
I heard about one on Adam and Eve (I wasn't around for it, but people were
referencing it for months after).
I haven't seen Bill DeWitt in here for a while. He used to like getting people
riled up. (For that matter, I don't think I've seen Ken post in here for a few
years. Whatever happened to our favorite AI?)
....Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
