POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Woot Server Time
3 Nov 2024 01:09:28 EDT (-0400)
  Woot (Message 1 to 10 of 15)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>
From: Tim Cook
Subject: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 11:17:09
Message: <480769f5$1@news.povray.org>
With the flick of a switch, my storage capacity goes from 1760.57 GB to 
2692.08 GB.  With my computer still on.

That's just crazy.

It's going to take a day to get files rearranged, because while it 
started at 47 MB/s, it's now trudging at like 13.

That's just crazy.

:P

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 12:45:32
Message: <48077eac$1@news.povray.org>
Tim Cook wrote:
> With the flick of a switch, my storage capacity goes from 1760.57 GB to 
> 2692.08 GB.  With my computer still on.

How'd you manage that?  Details, mon, Details!

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 13:05:48
Message: <4807836c@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
>> With the flick of a switch, my storage capacity goes from 1760.57 GB 
>> to 2692.08 GB.  With my computer still on.
> 
> How'd you manage that?  Details, mon, Details!

Added a 1 TB external USB drive.  Cost:  $209.11 incl. shipping.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 13:09:57
Message: <48078465$1@news.povray.org>
Tim Cook wrote:

> Added a 1 TB external USB drive.  Cost:  $209.11 incl. shipping.

IME, USB harddrives are drastically slower than even the lamest IDE one...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 13:55:39
Message: <48078f1b@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
> 
>> Added a 1 TB external USB drive.  Cost:  $209.11 incl. shipping.
> 
> IME, USB harddrives are drastically slower than even the lamest IDE one...
> 

If I can find it, I'll measure the speed of my 81MB Maxtor IDE drive, 
and we'll see.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 14:06:37
Message: <480791ad$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:10:07 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:

> Tim Cook wrote:
> 
>> Added a 1 TB external USB drive.  Cost:  $209.11 incl. shipping.
> 
> IME, USB harddrives are drastically slower than even the lamest IDE
> one...

I dunno, I've got two 1 TB USB drives; on USB 1.1 it's painful, but on 
USB 2.0 it's not too bad.  I tend to use them for archival purposes more 
than anything, but when I do the transfers in the office (local backup of 
materials since I work from home most of the time), the performance isn't 
bad.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 14:29:06
Message: <480796f2$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
> 
>> Added a 1 TB external USB drive.  Cost:  $209.11 incl. shipping.
> 
> IME, USB harddrives are drastically slower than even the lamest IDE one...

About 7x faster to read from internal than write to external USB at what 
it's currently doing, but it should be getting 47 MB/s the way it 
started out instead of plodding along at 13...but even at 13 MB/s it's 
enough to transfer a 23-minute video in 15 seconds.  Considering I got 
it to expand my archival space, I am content.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 16:54:12
Message: <4807b8f4@news.povray.org>
Tim Cook wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>
>> IME, USB harddrives are drastically slower than even the lamest IDE 
>> one...
> 
> About 7x faster to read from internal than write to external USB at what 
> it's currently doing, but it should be getting 47 MB/s the way it 
> started out instead of plodding along at 13...but even at 13 MB/s it's 

Actually, 47MB/s outrun even UDMA-channel (33MB/s).

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: Fredrik Eriksson
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 17 Apr 2008 18:26:14
Message: <op.t9r0l1y87bxctx@e6600.bredbandsbolaget.se>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:54:30 +0200, Eero Ahonen  
<aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Actually, 47MB/s outrun even UDMA-channel (33MB/s).

Except that (P)ATA-UDMA goes up to 133 MB/s (though some manufacturers  
stick to ATA/100) and USB drives typically come nowhere near 47 MB/s.


-- 
FE


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Woot
Date: 18 Apr 2008 04:20:26
Message: <480859ca$1@news.povray.org>
Tim Cook wrote:

> About 7x faster to read from internal than write to external USB at what 
> it's currently doing, but it should be getting 47 MB/s the way it 
> started out instead of plodding along at 13...

Disk fragmentation?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.