 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"math_prof" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.4807b46b40015d2d26e6f6f40@news.povray.org...
> How do I print an image in Wndows? I am told in linux there is a program
> called
> convert. How can one do this in Windows?
> Thanks
> Vrunda
LOL! Someone wants to print an image of mine... I knew I should have
rendered it! ;)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:34:51 EDT, "math_prof" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>How do I print an image in Wndows? I am told in linux there is a program called
>convert. How can one do this in Windows?
There is a program called Snagit that will copy your screen as either
a bitmap or extract the text from the screen. A couple of years ago
when the evaluation period was finished you could still use it by
pressing the continue to use button.
http://www.softwarecasa.com/pprod/212401dd.htm?gclid=CJaAkcyL5JICFQVDMAodbg5C1g
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> It seems to be quite
>> fashionable for people to suddenly release the sources for large
>> commercial applications these days, and I'm never really sure what it is
>> they're hoping to gain...
>
> Improving public image, hopefully also popularity. There are ways to
> make money with open source software too.
Those are valid reasons I guess...
>> Anyway, I would think that you wouldn't need a server to physically have
>> graphics hardware to access it remotely and get a graphical display of
>> some kind...
>
> Why install useless windowing software in a server that doesn't need it?
OK, point taken.
>> Yeah - but I doubt my blog attracts any of those.
>
>> [OTOH, I do sometimes mention Haskell...]
>
> Well, there you go. Haskell *is* a pet of many unix gurus too.
Really? This is news...
[Although - now who was it? - somebody recently announced that they were
porting all their distro tools from Python (?) to Haskell.]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> These are some of the coolest httpd requests I get:
>
> xxx.xx.x.xx - - [05/Apr/2008:01:48:54 +0000] "GET /pics/th_screws.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200
1709 "http://warp.povusers.org/pics/" "Mozilla/4.0 (PSP (PlayStation Portable); 2.00)"
290 2004
>
> (There's a total of 1267 requests with that architecture.)
...OK, that's even more bizare than an Amiga... most impressive!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Doesn't MS Paint come with Windows and at least handle copy and paste of
> images?
Yes and yes, but I prefer IrfanView personally...
[At least, that's what I'm using for Project Delta currently.]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> > (Or perhaps you are just evil and do that on purpose, and when someone
> > starts defending it you point out that you weren't really attacking the
> > current Solaris, but just a 10yo one...)
> Um, no. I wasn't bashing Solaris at all. I was pointing out that (1)
> yes, it's been on Intel chips at least 10 years, (2) I tried it, and (3)
> still remember how surprised I was that Sun supported Java better on the
> competitor's OS than their own.
Hmm, was that a demonstration of how you would have responded if someone
had claimed you are bashing Solaris?
> I think you read way more "bashing" into most of my statements at this
> point than I intend. It's merely conversation.
Maybe you should reread what I wrote?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> In fact, you know what? I challenge you to find a Google search term
>> that finds my blog. :-P
>
> "Orphi". You're #5 on the list.
>
> Or, if I do "Orphi blog", then you're #1 :)
That's astonishing... My name actually ranks that high in Google?
Anybody would think I'd been out link-spamming or something...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> You know, if you want people to read your Haskell raves, you probably
> shouldn't respond this way to other people's interests...
I just find it puzzling, that's all.
I mean, if the POV-Ray team released a brand new version of POV-Ray that
was exactly like the old one but up to 3% faster in certain cases...
would anybody care? No, not really. Yet the Linux kernel apparently
generates this much interest? I find that strange.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I mean, if the POV-Ray team released a brand new version of POV-Ray that
> was exactly like the old one but up to 3% faster in certain cases...
> would anybody care? No, not really. Yet the Linux kernel apparently
> generates this much interest? I find that strange.
If you discover a new fancy way of using gonads or whatever, why should
we care? ;)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> If you discover a new fancy way of using gonads or whatever, why should
> we care? ;)
One might retort that it allows me to build a full expression parser in
less than a dozen LoC, but yeah, realistically, who cares about that? I
should just go kill myself now...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
