On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:36:30 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>
>Beetroot would seem a more obvious choice...

For a dye or wine?
Doesn't mater Beetroot is used for both. To quote your bard.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Invisible,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

:-)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Now we know that you will be wearing a T-shirt, would it be too late to ask 
that you also wear some lower-limb coverings. They're a bit funny about that 
in the Jack Horner. (The Spanish Bar probably wouldn't give a damn)
I personally will be wearing Levi 501s (Red tag), whichever shirt is the 
cleanest and a blue fleece. Will probably have my laptop with me (in a 
courier satchel)

John

-- 
Not on my own machine and using OE

Post a reply to this message

Doctor John wrote:
> Now we know that you will be wearing a T-shirt, would it be too late to ask 
> that you also wear some lower-limb coverings. They're a bit funny about that 
> in the Jack Horner. (The Spanish Bar probably wouldn't give a damn)
> I personally will be wearing Levi 501s (Red tag), whichever shirt is the 
> cleanest and a blue fleece. Will probably have my laptop with me (in a 
> courier satchel)

Hmm. It has a flavour...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:23:34 +0100, "Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:

>Now we know that you will be wearing a T-shirt, would it be too late to ask 
>that you also wear some lower-limb coverings. 

LOL I seldom go out without my kecks :) 

>They're a bit funny about that 
>in the Jack Horner. (The Spanish Bar probably wouldn't give a damn)

Probably not :)

>I personally will be wearing Levi 501s (Red tag), whichever shirt is the 
>cleanest and a blue fleece. Will probably have my laptop with me (in a 
>courier satchel)
>

I will be wearing whatever I can get away with. I was thinking about
my leather restraint suit, the one with lots of buckles and zips :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> But you were not yet arrived on planet Earth then. Tea has been used
> as a dye since olden times. 

Tea has been used as a dye since before they invented cloth.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> But you were not yet arrived on planet Earth then. Tea has been used
>> as a dye since olden times. 
> 
> Tea has been used as a dye since before they invented cloth.
> 
So what did they dye with it?

John

-- 
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.

Post a reply to this message

"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
news:47fe70ce@news.povray.org...
> Darren New wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> But you were not yet arrived on planet Earth then. Tea has been used
>>> as a dye since olden times.
>>
>> Tea has been used as a dye since before they invented cloth.
>>
> So what did they dye with it?

     Sheep?  ;)

    Possibly make-up for ladies eyes. The Egyptians were good at dye making.

      ~Steve~



>
> John
>
> -- 
> I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
> world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
> finished," then he sat down.

Post a reply to this message

Doctor John wrote:
> So what did they dye with it?

Leather. Ever hear of "tanning"?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:57:24 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
>news:47fe70ce@news.povray.org...
>> Darren New wrote:

>>> Tea has been used as a dye since before they invented cloth.
>>>
>> So what did they dye with it?
>
>     Sheep?  ;)

You've been in Wales too long ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:21:40 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:

>Doctor John wrote:
>> So what did they dye with it?
>
>Leather. Ever hear of "tanning"?

That's not actually dying, is it?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:16:51 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 9 Apr 2008 16:59:50 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Actually, I think an "Instant Tea-Shirt" would be one you soak to make
>>tea.
> 
> You remind me, in the sixties I used tea to make a "tie and dyed"
> T-shirt. Groovy! :)

:-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Phil Cook wrote:

> Well the planner offers me a choice of leaving from Euston, or 
> Marylebone however the last train runs at 21:30 and 21:40 respectively, 
> after that and the next runs at 08:40. I could catch a later train and 
> change at Northampton so long as I don't mind waiting until 08:00. Even 
> if I do take the last direct train from Euston the last train from Snow 
> Hill for Kidderminster leaves half-an-hour before I even get there and 
> the next one is not until 09:30 I can't even catch a bloody bus from 
> Birmingham as everything shuts down overnight.
> 
> So unless I stay overnight it's basically - Hi everyone, oops gotta go. 
> Gotta love our public transport system :-)

Hmm... how did you obtain this information? I'm currently trying to plan 
my route also, but I don't have a timetable to hand... If the last train 
from Euston back towards Northampton really does leave at 21:30, I'm 
screwed too. :-S

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:22:07 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>
>Hmm... how did you obtain this information? I'm currently trying to plan 
>my route also, but I don't have a timetable to hand... If the last train 
>from Euston back towards Northampton really does leave at 21:30, I'm 
>screwed too. :-S

You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30

http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/en/pj/tt

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:32:29 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
wrote:

>You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30

MK not Hong Kong :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:32:29 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
> wrote:
> 
>> You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30
> 
> MK not Hong Kong :)

Train to Hong Kong? Da hell?! Think of the expense...! o_O

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

> You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30
> 
> http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/en/pj/tt

"Sorry, your session has expired due to inactivity."

Gotta love systems that make it easy to permalink stuff. (Zazzle is a 
favourit of mine in this regard. All their links tend to be *vast*...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:40:38 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>> You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30
>> 
>> http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/en/pj/tt
>
>"Sorry, your session has expired due to inactivity."
>
>Gotta love systems that make it easy to permalink stuff. (Zazzle is a 
>favourit of mine in this regard. All their links tend to be *vast*...)

Drat! Try this but you will have to make your own entries :)

http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/download_tt.html
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:39:45 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:32:29 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> You should be ok, 2 trains an hour to HK until 00:30
>> 
>> MK not Hong Kong :)
>
>Train to Hong Kong? Da hell?! Think of the expense...! o_O

And the time :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

>>> http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/en/pj/tt
>> "Sorry, your session has expired due to inactivity."
> 
> Drat! Try this but you will have to make your own entries :)

Don't worry - I have the information I want now. (The error page does at 
least provide a nice, clear, prominent link back to the search page.)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:22:07 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did  
spake, saying:

> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>>  So unless I stay overnight it's basically - Hi everyone, oops gotta  
>> go. Gotta love our public transport system :-)
>
> Hmm... how did you obtain this information? I'm currently trying to plan  
> my route also, but I don't have a timetable to hand... If the last train  
> from Euston back towards Northampton really does leave at 21:30, I'm  
> screwed too. :-S

As you've no doubt discovered it's only the trains that continue on to  
Brum that stop running late at night, looking at one timetable Euston to  
MK seems to run every 15 minutes up to about midnight suitable for all  
those late-night commuters.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:21:40 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> wrote:
> 
>> Doctor John wrote:
>>> So what did they dye with it?
>> Leather. Ever hear of "tanning"?
> 
> That's not actually dying, is it?

In some sense... :-)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:42:04 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:21:40 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Doctor John wrote:
>>>> So what did they dye with it?
>>> Leather. Ever hear of "tanning"?
>> 
>> That's not actually dying, is it?
>
>In some sense... :-)

Well yes, but ... :0
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
know? 
I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
themselves, what more can you ask for?

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
> of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
> know? 
> I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
> humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
> themselves, what more can you ask for?
> 
When St and I left, there were still a few surreal demonstrators around;
shame no-one had a camera :-( Really weird evening (view-wise). Shame
also that The Spanish Bar was too full to get near; I really wanted to
listen to Blueberry Hill played on their '60s juke-box (the real thing,
not an imitation).
Further to a short thread initiated by St and I last night, I have
posted two screenshots of my desktop over in p.b.i. Now that I've shown
you mine, you show me yours :-)

John

-- 
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
> of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
> know? 
> I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
> humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
> themselves, what more can you ask for?

Heh, if only... :-/

Anyway, I'm blogging it:

http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/272

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
news:1eb2041h8obi7dga5utqtb2dbq7ep6c0gp@4ax.com...
>
> Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
> of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
> know?
> I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
> humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
> themselves, what more can you ask for?

     Heh, yes it was a great night! Thoroughly enjoyed all of your company, 
and the best laugh I've had in ages! :)

     I've just got back in the last 20 mins when I should have been back 
last night - long story, so I won't go into it now, but am I really the only 
guy in the world that gets a London Cabby that *doesn't* know where he's 
going?

      "I'll drop you off here mate, it's the nearest I can get. If you go 
down that road, I think it's down there"

       Nearly an hour later, I'm ringing Stephen at the place the cabby 
dropped me off!! LOL

        Ah, I love it! :)

        Great night guys, would love to do it again sometime, and I'm glad 
Andrew got back safe! (I was worried!)

         Ah, 800 emails to get through - nice.  ;)

          ~Steve~



>
> -- 
>
> Regards
>     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

St. wrote:

>         Great night guys, would love to do it again sometime, and I'm glad 
> Andrew got back safe! (I was worried!)

Not as worried as Andrew was...

So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>
>So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)

Ok by me
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> 
>> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)
> 
> Ok by me
Wherever :-)

John

-- 
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.

Post a reply to this message

"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
news:480355aa$1@news.povray.org...
> Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>
>>> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)
>>
>> Ok by me
> Wherever :-)

      Seconded.  :o)

       ~Steve~






>
> John
>
> -- 
> I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
> world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
> finished," then he sat down.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:06:50 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
>news:480355aa$1@news.povray.org...
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)
>>>
>>> Ok by me
>> Wherever :-)
>
>      Seconded.  :o)
>
>   
Surely you mean thirded :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
news:vum604lqc1rpldb8bt4g3d0clm90anqs5g@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:06:50 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
>>news:480355aa$1@news.povray.org...
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)
>>>>
>>>> Ok by me
>>> Wherever :-)
>>
>>      Seconded.  :o)
>>
>>
> Surely you mean thirded :)

     Actually, I was going to say 'Fourthted'.   :)

      ~Steve~


> -- 
>
> Regards
>     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:34:32 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
>news:vum604lqc1rpldb8bt4g3d0clm90anqs5g@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:06:50 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Doctor John" <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
>>>news:480355aa$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:10 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok by me
>>>> Wherever :-)
>>>
>>>      Seconded.  :o)
>>>
>>>
>> Surely you mean thirded :)
>
>     Actually, I was going to say 'Fourthted'.   :)
>

I suppose you're right :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Invisible wrote:

> So, the Milton Keynes leisure plaza's City Limits next time? 0;-)

Statement #1: You people are crazy...

Statement #2: We should pick a time.

Statement #3: Ah sod it, I should just start a new thread for this. Hold 
on a sec...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:52:20 +0100, St. wrote:

> but am I really the
> only guy in the world that gets a London Cabby that *doesn't* know where
> he's going?

FWIW, I must've had the same cabby in San Francisco a few years ago - 
asked me how to get to the hotel I was staying at....

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 14 Apr 2008 10:50:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:52:20 +0100, St. wrote:
>
>> but am I really the
>> only guy in the world that gets a London Cabby that *doesn't* know where
>> he's going?

You shouldn't have worn your "My sister went to London and all I got
was this crappy t-shirt" T shirt. :)

>FWIW, I must've had the same cabby in San Francisco a few years ago - 
>asked me how to get to the hotel I was staying at....
>

Jim Charter's keeping a low profile :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen escribió:
> Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
> of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
> know? 
> I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
> humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
> themselves, what more can you ask for?

I'll invoke rule 24 of the Internet: Pictures or it didn't happen.

Post a reply to this message

"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote in message 
news:480387ea@news.povray.org...
> Stephen escribió:
>> Four Povers in a crowded pub full of demonstrators against the church
>> of scientology soon became. Four Povers in an empty pub, what do you
>> know? I had a good night, Andrew has only one head with a wicked sense of
>> humour and Dr. John and St are probably still there. No one disgraced
>> themselves, what more can you ask for?
>
> I'll invoke rule 24 of the Internet: Pictures or it didn't happen.

   Well, it is true that no-one had a camera on them, but the pictures in my 
head of Andrew all-agog at Mr. BigWig were truly an amazing sight to see and 
won't leave me.  ;)

    Sorry, can't do the sharing 'images in my brain thing' yet, but soon, 
ok?  I'll try the clockwork method for it...   ;)


      ~Steve~

Post a reply to this message

St. escribió:
>    Well, it is true that no-one had a camera on them

Oh well :)

Post a reply to this message

"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> a écrit dans le 
message de news: 480387ea@news.povray.org...

> I'll invoke rule 24 of the Internet: Pictures or it didn't happen.

Rule 34 of the internet would have been even more interesting :D

G.


-- 
**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray, Cinema 4D and Poser computer art
- Posters

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:09:57 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 14 Apr 2008 10:50:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:52:20 +0100, St. wrote:
>>
>>> but am I really the
>>> only guy in the world that gets a London Cabby that *doesn't* know
>>> where he's going?
> 
> You shouldn't have worn your "My sister went to London and all I got was
> this crappy t-shirt" T shirt. :)
> 
>>FWIW, I must've had the same cabby in San Francisco a few years ago -
>>asked me how to get to the hotel I was staying at....
>>
>>
> Jim Charter's keeping a low profile :)

Wrong side of the country...But yeah, where has he been?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:21:28 +0200, "Gilles Tran"
<gitran_nospam_@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

>"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> a écrit dans le 
>message de news: 480387ea@news.povray.org...
>
>> I'll invoke rule 24 of the Internet: Pictures or it didn't happen.
>
>Rule 34 of the internet would have been even more interesting :D
>

In a way rule 34 was ever present. Andrew was there after al,l and Dr
John and those women dressed as school kids :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Gilles Tran wrote:

> Rule 34 of the internet would have been even more interesting :D

There it is again... What the heck *is* rule 34??

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 escribió:
> Gilles Tran wrote:
> 
>> Rule 34 of the internet would have been even more interesting :D
> 
> There it is again... What the heck *is* rule 34??

http://rules.of-the-internet.com/

Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:29:19 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez
<nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:

>
>Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.

Except for Rule 34 ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

>> There it is again... What the heck *is* rule 34??
> 
> http://rules.of-the-internet.com/
> 
> Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.

Makes sense to me... but... OMG, *why* did I click that link?! >_<

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:29:19 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez
> <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
> 
>> Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.
> 
> Except for Rule 34 ;)

Ahh, Rule 35, I see. But, can anyone Rule 34 Rule 35?

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:15:40 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at
vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:29:19 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez
>> <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.
>> 
>> Except for Rule 34 ;)
>
>Ahh, Rule 35, I see. But, can anyone Rule 34 Rule 35?

Which "Rule 35"?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule+35
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:15:40 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at
> vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:29:19 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez
>>> <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rule 34: If it exists there is porn of it. No exceptions.
>>> Except for Rule 34 ;)
>> Ahh, Rule 35, I see. But, can anyone Rule 34 Rule 35?
> 
> Which "Rule 35"?
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule+35

 From Nicolas's link:
* Rule 35: The exception to Rule 34 is the citation of Rule 34.

However, can we apply Rule 34 to that Rule 35?

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:30:47 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at
vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:

>
> From Nicolas's link:
>* Rule 35: The exception to Rule 34 is the citation of Rule 34.

Phew!

>However, can we apply Rule 34 to that Rule 35?

If you want to ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message