 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <47fd989e@news.povray.org>, dne### [at] san rrcom says...
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
> > Oh, and one that is "not" work friendly, even close:
>
> If you want not-work-safe, check out http://www.pholph.com/
>
> My favorite scene: Author posts a note he'll be away a couple weeks.
> In-strip narrator does a bit of ritual human sacrifice so he can talk to
> the audience without the artist interfering. Which you only see if you
> mouse-over the comic. Which goes away when the artist gets back.
>
> The guy has a pretty sick imagination, altho it seems to have run down
> some and gotten kind of lame. The earlier arcs were edgier, and the
> latest one isn't bad, but ...
>
> If the first strip is disturbing, I'd suggest not continuing.
>
>
A lot of times I go for the art more than anything else. If it doesn't
look good, its too distracting for me, and I lose interest in the comic
fast. This one isn't too bad. Might be worth adding to my comic list.
--
void main () {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
...now I understand what they meant by "there aren't enough web comics
already". o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> OK, so #1: I finished reading the entire archive now. Woah, am I an
>>> official addict now or what? :-S
>> Thanks a lot, I'm going on #135 now... :P
>
> He got me reading it too <.<
Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> and then for the even more unsafe for work, and by that I mean don't
> read these at work at all:
> http://www.tmi-comic.com/
Why did you have to mention this? I spent 3 1/2 hours last night going
through the archives!
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
> Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
#326, I think I've been doing something productive.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
Enjoy #666 for me. ;-)
> And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
OK, that *is* pretty impressive actually...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
>
> Enjoy #666 for me. ;-)
>
>> And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
>
> OK, that *is* pretty impressive actually...
The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
> week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
Don't be too hard on yourself, it could happen to anyone.
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
>> week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
>
> Don't be too hard on yourself, it could happen to anyone.
I'm not being hard on myself. It just makes little sense that I got a
new distraction (thanks to the newsgroup mascot) yet got more productive.
But if I think "hey, getting distractions *makes me* more productive",
probably that won't work well... (the whole "correlation does not imply
causation" thing)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
