"Chris B" <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote:
> So far as I'm aware, space isn't a particular issue, the licensing is.
[snip]

Yes, of course, I hadn't thought of that.

> They also ask that some of their models are not used in
> specific ways (so no exploding Buddhas).

Spoilsports! ;-)

> Otherwise, you might consider writing up the technique on the Wiki.

Yes, that's true, I hadn't thought of that either!

It's likely that the utah teapot is a free-for-all, given that it's actually not
part of the scanned objects site, and the patch control points are everywhere. I
think some versions of OpenGL even use it as a primitive! But I'll make sure if
I ever follow this up.

Thanks for clarifying.

Bill

Post a reply to this message