|
 |
"Warp" <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a9678ad@news.povray.org...
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> : Yep - BTW, the layered texture didn't work ("can't layer over layered
> : texture").
>
> How can this be possible? A mandel pigment is not a layered texture.
>
It is if you apply Rune's (IIRC) fur texture to each pigment used. I'm sure
there is an elegant solution to my problem (splitting Rune's texture macro
into seperate pigment and normals and finishes for instance), but this is
for the IRTC so I've gone for the quick kludge (3 objects on top of each
other).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
"Chris Huff" <chr### [at] maccom> wrote in message
news:chrishuff-FE1FA1.10073623022001@news.povray.org...
> You mean "Can't layer over patterned texture"? That one is a pain with
> complex textures...
> Are you sure you need patterned textures here? My example only used a
> patterned pigment, which should work fine with texture layers. Could you
> post the code?
>
The code I've got or the code I want? ;) See my reply to Warp for more
details. I've worked out (at least in my head) many elegant solutions, but
time is a-running out so I've gone for the kludge (IRTC).
>
> > Would a non-averaging average pattern (if you see what I mean) be
> > possible?
>
> I've considered doing add, multiply, divide, etc...I was planning to do
> these along with my layered texture effects patch, which would allow you
> to specify how each layer affects the underlying layers, but which I
> never got working properly.
Shame!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
