|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi all,
This is probably such an elementary question, but how do I rotate an object in an
ellipse?
translate x*10
rotate y*clock*360
is all I've done before.
That's it. Any help gratefully received,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:04:09 -0000, Andrew Cocker
<and### [at] acockerfreeservecouk> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is probably such an elementary question, but how do I rotate an object in an
ellipse?
>
>translate x*10
>rotate y*clock*360
>
>is all I've done before.
>
>That's it. Any help gratefully received,
Aren't all mathematicians useless? :)
You're almost there. All you need to do now is
scale x*2
where 2 is the ratio of major axis to minor axis of your
ellipse. If you're wanting to do a simulation of Kepler's
Laws, though, you'll need something better because this
locates the center of the ellipse at the origin, and you
probably want one of the foci at the origin. Also, the
velocity will be neither constant nor physically correct.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker <par### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote:
: scale x*2
Wouldn't this scale the object too? I think that wasn't the intention.
The correct answer is:
instead of
translate x*10
rotate y*clock*360
make:
translate <Radius1*sin(2*pi*clock),0,Radius2*cos(2*pi*clock)>
--
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks Nieminen,
That's just what I was looking for
Andy Cocker
Nieminen Mika wrote in message <36a5ca46.0@news.povray.org>...
>Ron Parker <par### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote:
>: scale x*2
>
> Wouldn't this scale the object too? I think that wasn't the intention.
>
> The correct answer is:
>
>instead of
>
>translate x*10
>rotate y*clock*360
>
>make:
>
>translate <Radius1*sin(2*pi*clock),0,Radius2*cos(2*pi*clock)>
>
>--
>main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
>*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This reminds of when I used to draw out planetary ellipses rather
crudely in 2 dimensions with GW Basic. I've forgotten everything about
it pretty much.
This:
translate <Radius1*sin(2*pi*clock),0,Radius2*cos(2*pi*clock)>
might also be used like:
translate
<OffsetX+(RadiusX*sin(2*pi*clock)),0,OffsetZ+(RadiusZ*cos(2*pi*clock))>
where the offsets are coordinates to center upon, and may also be used
as:
#declare OffsetRadiusX=3 //example
#declare OffsetRadiusZ=1.5 //example
#declare OffsetX=OffsetRadiusX*sin(2*pi*clock)
#declare OffsetZ=OffsetRadiusZ*sin(2*pi*clock)
Then the final translation vector.
translate <OffsetX*sin(2*pi*clock)),0,OffsetZ*cos(2*pi*clock))>
This should make the "orbit" revolve upon an orbiting center of mass, as
it were. Which is how the Earth and Moon do, in a slight way.
Perhaps finally a third (smaller offset) component of the translate
vector, Y, could perturb this also making for an inclined (and wavy if
the clock is times 2 for example) orbital plane.
Or am I way off base with this whole suggestion?
I'm guessing about it, so none of this may be useable. I'll have to get
into this stuff again someday.
Nieminen Mika wrote:
>
> The correct answer is:
>
> instead of
>
> translate x*10
> rotate y*clock*360
>
> make:
>
> translate <Radius1*sin(2*pi*clock),0,Radius2*cos(2*pi*clock)>
>
Warp. -*/
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Bob,
Bob Hughes wrote in message <36A6D414.9DB0639D@aol.com>...
>This reminds of when I used to draw out planetary ellipses rather
>crudely in 2 dimensions with GW Basic. I've forgotten everything about
>it pretty much.
>This:
>
>translate <Radius1*sin(2*pi*clock),0,Radius2*cos(2*pi*clock)>
>
>might also be used like:
>
>translate
><OffsetX+(RadiusX*sin(2*pi*clock)),0,OffsetZ+(RadiusZ*cos(2*pi*clock))>
>
>where the offsets are coordinates to center upon, and may also be used
>as:
>
>#declare OffsetRadiusX=3 //example
>#declare OffsetRadiusZ=1.5 //example
>
>#declare OffsetX=OffsetRadiusX*sin(2*pi*clock)
>#declare OffsetZ=OffsetRadiusZ*sin(2*pi*clock)
>
>Then the final translation vector.
>
>translate <OffsetX*sin(2*pi*clock)),0,OffsetZ*cos(2*pi*clock))>
>
>This should make the "orbit" revolve upon an orbiting center of mass, as
>it were. Which is how the Earth and Moon do, in a slight way.
>
>Perhaps finally a third (smaller offset) component of the translate
>vector, Y, could perturb this also making for an inclined (and wavy if
>the clock is times 2 for example) orbital plane.
>
>Or am I way off base with this whole suggestion?
>I'm guessing about it, so none of this may be useable.
No,no,no, this is great. I really ought to learn how to use sin/pi etc
Tata
Andy C
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|