clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Just for the records: It is worthy to note that the bounding box of an
> object is not necessarily a perfect fit; depending on the type of object
> and how it has been rotated, it might be noticeably larger.
Right-o. Always good to have that datum repeated as a refresher lest it bite
That actually gave rise to a fair bit of exploration and learning:
Post a reply to this message