clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> Just for the records: It is worthy to note that the bounding box of an
> object is not necessarily a perfect fit; depending on the type of object
> and how it has been rotated, it might be noticeably larger.

Right-o.  Always good to have that datum repeated as a refresher lest it bite
the unsuspecting.

That actually gave rise to a fair bit of exploration and learning:

http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3C5ef59918%241%40news.povray.org%3E/

http://news.povray.org/povray.text.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.5db5b0ff51c96acafeeb22ff0%40news.povray.org%3E/

http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.5dc8a318adf09f614eec112d0%40news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=432391
&toff=100

http://news.povray.org/povray.text.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.5dc33544f7b9a3affeeb22ff0%40news.povray.org%3E/


and finally:
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.6067c66d2a07e751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E/

Post a reply to this message