"Maetes" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I worked on your scripts yesterday and I have to say, Dennis looks really cool.
>
> In the Inc file of Bike and Audi it is quite messy, but I separated and cleaned
> up Bike, Audi maybe today.
> The BMW also looks good, I'll get to work on it right away.
>
> I'll post the scripts I've changed as soon as they are presentable, until then
> greetings from Dennis :)
>
> And from me, of course.
> Ma

Nice job!
Be careful, because Dennis was wandering around the web, I just captured him,
cleaned him, colored him, meshed him, and...
imported into our PovRay world!
thanks also to the unknown author!

PS.
I wrote that I can't post my executable for transformations here. I don't want
to post exe that often (always) worry with false positives of the antivirus.

But scripts and plugins written in plain text are not a concern, so I thought
I'd make a new topic in the next few days with two plugins for SketcUp.
- Import STL
- Export POV and/or inc.
I think they could be useful.
They are made for SketchUp 8 and SketchUp Make 2017.
In SketchUp you can give truecolor colors and transparencies that will then also
be acquired by PovRay.
The latest FREE versions (8 and Make 2017) that you can find on the web.
The most recent ones are paid and I haven't tested them.
So stay online ... if you're interested
BR
G.

Post a reply to this message

"GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> General algorithms are no good in my opinion.
> They are recursive and have unintelligent ways.
> They consume memory.
> They exaggerate in the points that are already rich and perhaps are deficient in
> the points that need it most.

What you could do is test the distance between points, and points that are far
apart can get refined, and points that are close together can get skipped.

However, I'd suggest making it more sophisticated than that - test the curvature
along some distance on the surface.  Flat areas get skipped, and highly curved
areas get refined.   Find some way to appropriately weight the curvature vs
distance metrics.

Unnecessarily subdivided flat faces could be simplified into a single quad.

Not easy work - very tedious.  But well commented code and a flowchart of the
logic would help in future development.

- BE

Post a reply to this message

"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
> > General algorithms are no good in my opinion.
> > They are recursive and have unintelligent ways.
> > They consume memory.
> > They exaggerate in the points that are already rich and perhaps are deficient in
> > the points that need it most.
>
> What you could do is test the distance between points, and points that are far
> apart can get refined, and points that are close together can get skipped.
>
> However, I'd suggest making it more sophisticated than that - test the curvature
> along some distance on the surface.  Flat areas get skipped, and highly curved
> areas get refined.   Find some way to appropriately weight the curvature vs
> distance metrics.
>
> Unnecessarily subdivided flat faces could be simplified into a single quad.
>
> Not easy work - very tedious.  But well commented code and a flowchart of the
> logic would help in future development.
>
> - BE

You're right, but my goal is more modest. I would leave the rendering engine the
option to adapt the quality to the distance.
Second Life did it many years ago, and I think that more or less all 3D
rendering programs do it.
I don't actually know, in advance, when I create an object for my library, at
what distance it will be seen. I use the library to obtain landscape contexts
where things are as light as possible.
We got into this discussion because jr, rightly, about the BMW, said that
certain parts were too simplified. Even with the smoothing of the triangles. For
this reason, for me it is important to be able to keep the weight of the object
light, but also to have a tool for fine-tuning the critical points.
Implementing mesh enrichment is a good starting point in my opinion. If I want,
when well tested, I could also make it recursive on the entire model.
But it must generate the model. The method we saw is more of a feature of the
render engine, it is volatile. In my opinion it should be addressed at the pov
ray engine level... like "remeshing <SplitValue, WPdistance, etc etc> "

Post a reply to this message

For my last version see zip file.

I had hoped a bit for a nice collection of cars and people.
It looks nice, but I'm sure I've done too much work for 3 vehicles and 2 people.
Maybe I'll continue and clean up better, should new models appear.

Ciao
Ma

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'gio_250624.zip' (718 KB)

Here an image will all models

ma

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'test_all_01.png' (807 KB)

Preview of image 'test_all_01.png'

"Maetes" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Here an image will all models
>
> ma

very nice!

I'm preparing some high definition models, but in the meantime, to be observed
from afar because it's very light, a driver (or a G-man) lol is needed to
monitor the vehicles....
It's a inc, remove the two bottom bars to use it as a standalone pov..
B.R.
G.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'maninblack.zip' (68 KB)

hi,

"GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> "Maetes" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > Here an image will all models
> > ma
> very nice!
>
> I'm preparing some high definition models, but in the meantime, to be observed
> from afar because it's very light, a driver (or a G-man) lol is needed to
> monitor the vehicles....
> It's a inc, remove the two bottom bars to use it as a standalone pov..

thank you !  if, while you're on the exporting things stuff, you could output
the finish with a braced reflection[*], written eg:
  finish{ambient .21 diffuse .78 reflection {.01}}
then your code will be correct, and can be used with WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork.

[*] as documented
<wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Specular_Reflection>.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> hi,
>
> "GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > "Maetes" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > > Here an image will all models
> > > ma
> > very nice!
> >
> > I'm preparing some high definition models, but in the meantime, to be observed
> > from afar because it's very light, a driver (or a G-man) lol is needed to
> > monitor the vehicles....
> > It's a inc, remove the two bottom bars to use it as a standalone pov..
>
> thank you !  if, while you're on the exporting things stuff, you could output
> the finish with a braced reflection[*], written eg:
>   finish{ambient .21 diffuse .78 reflection {.01}}
> then your code will be correct, and can be used with WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork.
>
> [*] as documented
> <wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Specular_Reflection>.
>
>
> regards, jr.

I have to apologize because my English is poor and I don't understand the
problem.
Each mesh represents an object that is part of the complete shape, but has its
autonomy, each mesh has its definition of RGB or RGB color with alpha
transparency. The rest of the definition is standard, and can be modified as you
want.
My standard definition does not give me any errors or warnings by Povray, so it
is correct.
It is also easy to modify it, just search on Povray for the keywords -end mesh-
of the comments and modify the previous lines.
The definition is double with the inside because experimenting I saw that this
system hides a bit the artifacts of the smooth_triangle bug. Let's hope they are
solved with the next version of Povray ...
.... please
" WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork." sorry , what is the meaning? I cannot understand ..
because I don't know these abbreviations

Sorry againg and many thanks ...
BR
G.

Post a reply to this message

hi,

"GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > ...hi,
> > thank you !  if, while you're on the exporting things stuff, you could output
> > the finish with a braced reflection[*], written eg:
> >   finish{ambient .21 diffuse .78 reflection {.01}}
> > then your code will be correct, and can be used with WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork.
> > [*] as documented
> > <wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Specular_Reflection>.
>
> I have to apologize because my English is poor and I don't understand the
> problem.

nessun problema.  (Google Translate tells me :-))


> ...
> My standard definition does not give me any errors or warnings by Povray, so it
> is correct.

no, alas.  no warnings/errors is the result of (what I consider) bugs in the
POV-Ray parser.  see this example from the reference page:

    finish { reflection {1.0} ambient 0 diffuse 0 }

your code is missing the braces required by 'reflection'.


> ...
> " WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork." sorry , what is the meaning? I cannot understand ..
> because I don't know these abbreviations

yes, sorry.  WFP = William F Pokorny, he's the author of 'yuqk', a branch/fork
from the POV-Ray 3.8 line.  see, for example, the following thread:
<news.povray.org/povray.binaries.programming/thread/%3C68258118%241%40news.povray.org%3E/>

(and his parser is stricter than POV-Ray's, enforcing the 'reflection {}'
syntax)



regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> hi,
>
> "GioSeregni" <gms### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > > ...hi,
> > > thank you !  if, while you're on the exporting things stuff, you could output
> > > the finish with a braced reflection[*], written eg:
> > >   finish{ambient .21 diffuse .78 reflection {.01}}
> > > then your code will be correct, and can be used with WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork.
> > > [*] as documented
> > > <wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Finish#Specular_Reflection>.
> >
> > I have to apologize because my English is poor and I don't understand the
> > problem.
>
> nessun problema.  (Google Translate tells me :-))
>
>
> > ...
> > My standard definition does not give me any errors or warnings by Povray, so it
> > is correct.
>
> no, alas.  no warnings/errors is the result of (what I consider) bugs in the
> POV-Ray parser.  see this example from the reference page:
>
>     finish { reflection {1.0} ambient 0 diffuse 0 }
>
> your code is missing the braces required by 'reflection'.
>
>
> > ...
> > " WFP's 'yuqk' branch/fork." sorry , what is the meaning? I cannot understand ..
> > because I don't know these abbreviations
>
> yes, sorry.  WFP = William F Pokorny, he's the author of 'yuqk', a branch/fork
> from the POV-Ray 3.8 line.  see, for example, the following thread:
>
<news.povray.org/povray.binaries.programming/thread/%3C68258118%241%40news.povray.org%3E/>
>
> (and his parser is stricter than POV-Ray's, enforcing the 'reflection {}'
> syntax)
>
>
>
> regards, jr.

Thanks, great, now I understand and I corrected the finish code.
It was simple and quick, but now I have to take a short break to fix an issue
that seems important to me.
The recognizability at first sight of each mesh object.
It will take a little time because I want to align on a new feature all my
plugins and also the executable that I use for the conversions (CAD - STL
-PovRay) of my models.
Let me explain better.
The various formats "understand" which mesh they are translating because the
finishes are defined in a common and recognizable format that begins with the
CAD drawing that assigns the layer name.
In the layer name there is the color information.
The name is in hexadecimal, because it is easy to read.
Example HEXFF0000T7F means rgb red, with alpha (Transparency) equal to 50%, 127
of 255
This system creates a database with its pointers to finishes that helps organize
the meshes and the smooth.

UDT  for my system details for a model:

TYPE Internal
 numfacets AS LONG ' 4 bytes
 Xmin AS DOUBLE
 Xmax AS DOUBLE
 Ymin AS DOUBLE
 Ymax AS DOUBLE
 Zmin AS DOUBLE
 Zmax AS DOUBLE    'END HEADER

' start bloCnt________________________ LOOP

 x0      As Double
 y0      AS Double
 z0      As Double
 x1      As Double
 y1      As Double 'vertex = 72 bytes
 z1      As Double
 x2      As Double
 y2      As Double
 z2      As Double '__________________
 LayerCo As Double    ' 8 bytes
 EntitCo As Double    ' 8 bytes
 Transp  As Double    ' 8 bytes
' end bloCnt  ________________________

'                   repeat bloCnts IN LOOP

END OF FILE

 TargetX AS DOUBLE
 TargetY AS DOUBLE
 TargetZ AS DOUBLE
 WPntX   AS DOUBLE 'view = 48 bytes
 WPntY   AS DOUBLE
 WPntZ   AS DOUBLE
 Orto    AS DOUBLE   '8 bytes


But it's a database that uses long integers (or long ) and I can't add strings
for various reasons.
So I thought of a dictionary that uses the color as an index, to remember what
kind of object it is. A parallel, textual file of specifications.
Example "shoes"
In the database HEX000000
[T00] optional, not needed here.
But in the dictionary "clean and shiny shoes".
THIS COMMENT will be in a comment label in the PovRay mesh.
It will be useful to easily customize the files.
Not only that, this reminder label, adjustable in "human" language could be used
by those who want ALSO as a prompt for the AI... which could automatically
suggest the best finish for the mesh.
It may all seem very strange, but in this way each model, with a simple label at
the end of each mesh, becomes very flexible and improvable.

Thanks aagain! see you later ...
G.

Post a reply to this message