POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Ambient Occlusion in POV? Server Time
2 Nov 2024 11:23:20 EDT (-0400)
  Ambient Occlusion in POV? (Message 1 to 3 of 3)  
From: anto matkovic
Subject: Ambient Occlusion in POV?
Date: 1 Apr 2004 18:39:15
Message: <406ca823@news.povray.org>
I am just curious - did someone tried to implement this in POV?
Something like at
http://www-viz.tamu.edu/students/bmoyer/617/ambocc/
Seems to be popular in renderers like a Mental Ray, Lightwave (gMill, I
think).
Big advantage of AO is apllying local as material, usually it probe geometry
only,  without lighting or colors, and simply do holes darker, so it can
process a lot of details, very fast....


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Ambient Occlusion in POV?
Date: 1 Apr 2004 19:00:41
Message: <406cad29@news.povray.org>
It looks a lot like the radiosity algorithm used in POV-Ray setting
the recursion level to 1 and a white sky_sphere.
  (The advantage is that POV-Ray can reuse nearby samples thus speeding
up the rendering.)

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Christopher James Huff
Subject: Re: Ambient Occlusion in POV?
Date: 1 Apr 2004 22:56:14
Message: <cjameshuff-941F0F.22564701042004@news.povray.org>
In article <406ca823@news.povray.org>,
 "anto matkovic" <ant### [at] matkoviccom> wrote:

> I am just curious - did someone tried to implement this in POV?
> Something like at
> http://www-viz.tamu.edu/students/bmoyer/617/ambocc/
> Seems to be popular in renderers like a Mental Ray, Lightwave (gMill, I
> think).
> Big advantage of AO is apllying local as material, usually it probe geometry
> only,  without lighting or colors, and simply do holes darker, so it can
> process a lot of details, very fast....

Looks like a crude form of radiosity, or an odd cross between radiosity 
and the proximity pattern. Unlike radiosity, it will have to do the 
samples for every evaluation of the pattern, so it will be inefficient 
and slow. The results won't be as good quality as actual radiosity, 
either, you will have to use a lot of samples to reduce graininess. The 
benefit is that you can use it on individual objects, but a better 
solution would be to modify radiosity to allow the user to specify which 
objects affect it and which objects are illuminated by it.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.