 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1 st priority: logo 06
2 nd priority: logo 09
3 rd priority: logo 11
4 th priority: logo 08
5 th priority: logo 02
6 th priority: logo 03
7 th priority: logo 04
8 th priority: logo 05
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Nicht an Tueren mangelt es,
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | sondern an der Einrichtung (aka Content).
| | | hjp### [at] wsr acat | -- Ale### [at] univieacat
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | zum Thema Portale in at.linux
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Ricardo M Pereyra
Subject: RE: POV-Ray Logo Competition - Vote Here !
Date: 18 Apr 2000 23:27:42
Message: <38fd27ae@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
my preferences:
> 1 st priority: logo 04
> 2 nd priority: logo 06
> 3 rd priority: logo 11
> 4 th priority: logo 05
> 5 th priority: logo 13
> 6 th priority: logo 14
> 7 th priority: logo 12
> 8 th priority: logo 08
> 9 th priority: logo 09
> 10 th priority: logo 07
> 11 th priority: logo 03
> 12 th priority: logo 10
> 13 th priority: logo 02
> 14 th priority: logo 15
> 15 th priority: logo 01
- --
|
_-/^\-_
________________-_~__( o )__~_-_______________
( --------------- ,/^\, -------------- )
( () () )
( )
( El arte de fumigar, no se aprende en una escuela )
( como no se llega a abuela, sin antes pasar por madre. )
( Fumigar no tiene encuadre, y escapa a todas las reglas )
( - Vicente Bomvissuto - )
\---- Ricardo Miguel Pereyra <rip### [at] toddcomar> ----/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 Int. for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgpinternational.com>
iQA/AwUBOPxvVxHKqYbo8t5ZEQIjGACfUytDC8SXifAzNjz4C9kjdW/IgXoAoMYl
O+H3Nl88R/ffW93fvyXGN9bv
=LXCK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 1 st priority: logo __4
> 2 nd priority: logo __11
> 3 rd priority: logo __8
> 4 th priority: logo __3
> 5 th priority: logo __6
regard
Rodolphe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nathan Kopp <Nat### [at] koppcom> wrote:
: Hey... I just noticed that #15 is a modified yin-yang symbol. That is very
: interesting. :-)
That's why I didn't like it...
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: Suggestion (Was: POV-Ray Logo Competition - Vote Here !)
Date: 19 Apr 2000 03:05:24
Message: <38fd5ab4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune <run### [at] inamecom> wrote:
: Keep doing rounds until all logos but one is excluded. That's it.
I still don't like this. It's very possible that the second and perhaps
the third miss winning by just a bit. It's unfair to discard them.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Andry Gunawan
Subject: Re: POV-Ray Logo Competition - Vote Here !
Date: 19 Apr 2000 03:35:38
Message: <38fd61ca@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 1 st priority: logo __11
> 2 nd priority: logo __3
> 3 rd priority: logo __12
> 4 th priority: logo __4
> 5 th priority: logo __13
> 6 th priority: logo __14
> 7 th priority: logo __9
> 8 th priority: logo __6
> 9 th priority: logo __5
> 10 th priority: logo __15
> 11 th priority: logo __1
> 12 th priority: logo __7
> 13 th priority: logo __2
> 14 th priority: logo __9
> 15 th priority: logo __8
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
> POV-Ray Logo Competition - Voting
>
> Anybody using POV-Ray may vote.
>
> I hope as many as possible will!
>
> o The Logos
>
> You can view the logos from here:
>
> http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povlogos/
>
> o The Rules
>
> You make a reply to this message in which
> you specify your priorities.
>
> At the 1st priority you write the number
> of your favorite logo. At the 2nd priority
> you write the number of your second
> favorite, and so on...
>
> You may specify all 15 priorities, or you
> may specify some of them only, but at
> least one.
>
> If you specify some of the priorities
> only, the fields that you specify must be
> the uppermost ones, and the fields that
> you leave blank must be the lowermost ones.
>
> You may specify one logo per priority only.
>
> Note that although some of the logos are
> quite similar, you should vote for both
> versions if you like both versions. Nothing
> is taken for granted.
>
> If something is unclear, please tell me.
>
> The voting period ends May 17
>
> o Vote Here
>
> Use the following in your reply:
>
> 1 st priority: logo __I like logo #4
> 2 nd priority: logo __#6
> 3 rd priority: logo __
> 4 th priority: logo __
> 5 th priority: logo __
> 6 th priority: logo __
> 7 th priority: logo __
> 8 th priority: logo __
> 9 th priority: logo __
> 10 th priority: logo __
> 11 th priority: logo __
> 12 th priority: logo __
> 13 th priority: logo __
> 14 th priority: logo __
> 15 th priority: logo __
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
1 st priority: logo 2
2 nd priority: logo 8
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
>
> o Vote Here
>
> Use the following in your reply:
>
> 1 st priority: logo 13
> 2 nd priority: logo 11
> 3 rd priority: logo 2
> 4 th priority: logo 5
> 5 th priority: logo 3
> 6 th priority: logo 12
> 7 th priority: logo 15
> 8 th priority: logo 8
> 9 th priority: logo 10
> 10 th priority: logo 6
> 11 th priority: logo 4
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nathan Kopp" wrote:
> Actually, many logos don't even express what the
> software is. Sure, it would be great if a logo
> succeeded at that, but I don't think it is
> necessary.
I agree.
> Also, many of these logos (such as #15) are just
> black & white outlines. Such a logo could easily
> be extended into 3D with detailed textures and
> complex lighting. But in that case the logo
> doesn't depend on the fancy lighting.
Exactly. One thing is the logo, another thing is how it is presented.
That's why I made those low-res black and white versions required. So one
could see what the logos would look like in their simplest forms.
> Hey... I just noticed that #15 is a modified
> yin-yang symbol. That is very interesting. :-)
Indeed!
Who made that logo anyway?
<looking up into the sky, whistling innocently>
;-)
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated March 15: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
