"Nathan Kopp" wrote:
> Actually, many logos don't even express what the
> software is.  Sure, it would be great if a logo
> succeeded at that, but I don't think it is
> necessary.

I agree.

> Also, many of these logos (such as #15) are just
> black & white outlines. Such a logo could easily
> be extended into 3D with detailed textures and
> complex lighting.  But in that case the logo
> doesn't depend on the fancy lighting.

Exactly. One thing is the logo, another thing is how it is presented.
That's why I made those low-res black and white versions required. So one
could see what the logos would look like in their simplest forms.

> Hey... I just noticed that #15 is a modified
> yin-yang symbol.  That is very interesting.  :-)

Indeed!

Who made that logo anyway?

<looking up into the sky, whistling innocently>

;-)

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated March 15: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message