> But I think that maybe this is an accuracy thing with the roots of the equation,
> so maybe since the surface is infinitely thin, do something like creating a very
> thin shell using "abs(Function (x, y, z)) - a very small value".
> The other thing you could try is make it an isosurface and see if somehow that
> works any better. You can also employ the shell method with that as well.
> That's all I've got right now.
I actually wrote this a while ago, and at that time I think I tried with an
isosurface but can't remember what was not working (on the top of my head I'd
say it was unpractically slow ?)
> Very cool surface, by the way :)
> I might look at this for inspiration if I ever fool around with refining my
> modeling of the "schist disk" again.
Thanks :) This is kind of a classic actually, a so-called Seifert surface for a
torus knot. I isolated the problematic part when asking this question but if
you're curious here is what I actually wanted to plot (using jr tweaks ! Thought
I get an error from the +ac0.99 option, I'll try to figure out why).
Post a reply to this message
Download 'out.png' (196 KB)
Preview of image 'out.png'