> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > ...
> > If you really want to improve the installation documentation situation,
> > my suggestion would be to help us (*) improve `unix/README.md` (which
> > constitutes THE authoritative quick-install instructions for Linux and
> > other Unixoids) and `unix/install.txt` (wich currently constitutes THE
> > authoritative detailed documentation of the installation process for
> > such platforms).
> good thought. I tend to simply download a tarball, so will have a look at the
> included readme/install/etc files in the coming days.
have only found time for cursory reading so far. the 'unix/*' readme + install
files, on the whole, are ok. there's some .. rubbish, like the talk about
"*-dev" packages, which makes no sense when you get the source tarball from the
author(s). (and on some OS' "*-dev" makes no sense at all) anyway, will find
more time in the coming days (I hope) and post/send my $0.02.
Post a reply to this message