Le 2023-03-18 à 13:37, Bald Eagle a écrit :
> You're really not going to believe this:
Yes, hard to believe how hard some peoples work to impose some arbitrary
meaning to some objects or proportions.
«Conclusions In Summary
Based on the best understanding we currently have of the object, and on
the knowledge of normal fundamental limits of physics and laws of
nature, we have to conclude:
That this object was fabricated on a highly sophisticated
subtractive manufacturing system, from a solid piece of granite.
That the manufacturing system would require, at the very least,
sophisticated mechanical technology and high-precision components.
That the manufacturing system would necessarily have been guided by
an automated control system, which could read the design as input, and
produce the required motions as output.
That a turing machine, of considerable sophistication, would most
likely have been employed to create and operate on the design, and to
finally transfer it to the manufacturing system.
There is no way, in which we can attribute the production of this
artefact, to anyone who do not possess, at minimum, the level of
technological sophistication and capabilities mentioned above. This
raises some very interesting questions regarding the origin of the
object, which we hope to be able to explore in future work.»
WHY does the author totally ignore that it could have been made entirely
by hand WITHOUT any technology more advanced than Bronze age tools and
lot of available time.
Once roughly carved, the object can get meticulously refined and
smoothed by hand.
Post a reply to this message