POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Comparison of POV-Ray 2.2 & 3.7 : Re: Comparison of POV-Ray 2.2 & 3.7 Server Time
23 Feb 2024 16:00:45 EST (-0500)
  Re: Comparison of POV-Ray 2.2 & 3.7  
From: 19100
Date: 26 May 2023 17:52:44
Message: <20230526225237.a5393c7190305652a63ca140@disroot.org>
Thank you for the feedback Kenneth, and good job finding Cluster (I'll have to look
through that collection, most of it is new to me too). If you don't mind I would like
to put you as a contributor when the article is updated.

Never heard of Rayshade before, though it looks like it's still being maintained:
Not dissimilar to POV-Ray it seems, I'll have to poke around at some point.

On Fri, 26 May 2023 15:38:45 EDT
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> Those are interesting comparisons, and a nicely-made site. Good comments too.
> I started working with POV-ray v3.5 or 3.6, around 2004(?). I missed a lot of
> the early renders and experiments.
> For your "Cluster of mirrored spheres" entry (cluster.pov), you mentioned not
> knowing the author. The closest possibility I could come up with was here...
> https://archive.org/details/max_photos_2500/3D%27S/BALLS8.GIF
> It looks like a collection of very early raytracing renders, some made in DKB
> Trace. Scroll through the images to 27, 28 and 29. One of those says "Andy Fu".
> although it was apparently rendered in a program called RAYSHADE.
> I've attached the GIF image here.

Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.