clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> I think it's no good to implicitly presume any particular handedness
> throughout the docs; while there is a default handedness, there are also
> people who override the handedness "by default".
Uh, wouldn't the WAY they "override" the handedness be directly related to the
default handedness? I mean, if they're reversing the left-handed default as
part of their custom setup, then they must be presuming that there's a
left-handedness to be reversed in the first place.
Just being an academic PITA ;)
Post a reply to this message