On 6/9/2017 8:15 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> ... they didn't make it into the docs most likely due to a foo somewhere 
> with regex pattern matching in WikiDocGen. I'll have a look

i take it back ... a quick look on the wiki and i think it's the markup 
concerning < and > that appear (and is missing in one place ... the box 
declaration) where > and < should have been used in the predefined 
text blocks that encloses the examples. this weekend i'll make some 
edits and test my theory.

Post a reply to this message