 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:web.6074bdf9a906d8e387570eabd4644d08@news.povray.org Robert
McGregor wrote:
> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineart com> wrote:
>> Attached is a detail of this setup.
>
I realy like your scenes and the "evolution images".
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Something I noticed: both the rocks formation and the towers just barely
> touch the ground. Is that on purpose? For the towers I can think of a
> reason or two, but the rocks?
I thought the same thing when I was placing the rocks, but as I lowered them it
was still happening. Turns out it's really just an optical illusion; the angle
of the light source causes side shadows that make it _look_ like they're
floating, but they're actually penetrating the plane. Adding the grass solved
that problem.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ingo <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> I realy like your scenes and the "evolution images".
Thanks Ingo, I wasn't sure if people might just find them annoying :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:web.6075d499a906d8e387570eabd4644d08@news.povray.org Robert
McGregor wrote:
> people might just find them annoying
Wellll everyting tha's better than I can do annoys me Grrrrr ;)
(A too distracted mind)
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Mr" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
>>> A detail render of the multiple beam towers doing whatever it is they do...
>>
>> they do it damn well !
>
> Thanks Maurice!
>
>
> Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> The rocks are very... mmm... snowy? plastic?
>> I like them!
>
> Hahah, thanks Paolo - the rocks do look pretty terrible without textures, but
> that's part of the texturing fun for me - the illusion of detail :)
>
>
> Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>> Now, add some focal blur to take the eye away from those rock formation.
>
> I thought about that at first, but today I've been playing around with tracing
> down some plants and I really like how it's looking now, so I'm probably going
> to leave everything in focus for this scene. Two plant species, three variations
> each, for a total of 30,000 plants traced down onto the rocks and ground plane.
> Attached is a detail of this setup.
>
>
>
>
That vegetation is quite convincing. Good work.
I've actually seen some real life rocks that had similar vegetation on them.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 13/04/2021 om 19:27 schreef Robert McGregor:
> ingo <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> I realy like your scenes and the "evolution images".
>
> Thanks Ingo, I wasn't sure if people might just find them annoying :)
>
>
"annoying" no; "instructive" yes.
We should all provide more scene building info like this.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Robert McGregor wrote on 12/04/2021 23:18:
> "Mr" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
>>> A detail render of the multiple beam towers doing whatever it is they do...
>>
>> they do it damn well !
>
> Thanks Maurice!
>
>
> Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> The rocks are very... mmm... snowy? plastic?
>> I like them!
>
> Hahah, thanks Paolo - the rocks do look pretty terrible without textures, but
> that's part of the texturing fun for me - the illusion of detail :)
>
>
> Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>> Now, add some focal blur to take the eye away from those rock formation.
>
> I thought about that at first, but today I've been playing around with tracing
> down some plants and I really like how it's looking now, so I'm probably going
> to leave everything in focus for this scene. Two plant species, three variations
> each, for a total of 30,000 plants traced down onto the rocks and ground plane.
> Attached is a detail of this setup.
>
>
>
>
The rocks now are truly impressive, one can imagine a whole ecosystem
between moss and grass!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ingo <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> in news:web.6075d499a906d8e387570eabd4644d08@news.povray.org Robert
> McGregor wrote:
>
> > people might just find them annoying
>
> Wellll everyting tha's better than I can do annoys me Grrrrr ;)
>
> (A too distracted mind)
Hahah!
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> "annoying" no; "instructive" yes.
Thanks Thomas, that's good to know.
> We should all provide more scene building info like this.
Yes, _I_ would be certainly be interested in seeing how others go about building
their scenes.
Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> That vegetation is quite convincing. Good work.
> I've actually seen some real life rocks that had similar vegetation on them.
Thanks very much Alain :)
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> The rocks now are truly impressive, one can imagine a whole ecosystem
> between moss and grass!
Yes, the plants were a lot of fun for me, thanks Paolo.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'maidenvoyagewips-7-8.jpg' (958 KB)
Preview of image 'maidenvoyagewips-7-8.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Op 12/04/2021 om 23:39 schreef Robert McGregor:
> > "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
> > Hmm, I noticed that the previous image I posted doesn't show up in the Image
> > Digest - too large maybe?
> >
> > Here's a 1920x720px version...
> >
>
> I got it without a problem.
You use a newsreader so that works eh? It doesn't show up in the Web version of
the Image Digest that I use at http://news.povray.org, I guess the resolution is
too large.
> D*** good rocks and texturing! Look like some weathered granite outcrops
> with mossy overgrowing. A texture that leaves me slavering indeed ;-)
>
> With the vegetation the scene suddenly changes from inferred desert to
> savanna. I would like to see the view!
Thanks Thomas, here's a full sized render (which probably won't show up in the
web view).
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rwm_maidenvoyage_2560x1080px.jpg' (2002 KB)
Preview of image 'rwm_maidenvoyage_2560x1080px.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And here's a smaller version (width 1920px) of the "final" render since the
larger resolution again doesn't show up in the web-based Image Digest.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rwm_maidenvoyage_1920x810px.jpg' (1163 KB)
Preview of image 'rwm_maidenvoyage_1920x810px.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
