 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor John <j.g### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
> I like the way this is going. An excellent use of chiaroscuro
>
> John
> --
> Protect the Earth
> It was not given to you by your parents
> You hold it in trust for your children
Thanks, but now I don't know whre to go. Maybe use another light for the back, I
try different things.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-11-2013 14:09, Fractracer wrote:
> Thanks, but now I don't know whre to go. Maybe use another light for the back, I
> try different things.
>
For me, this looks finished. I think that any additional light would
ruin the effect.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 25-11-2013 14:09, Fractracer wrote:
> > Thanks, but now I don't know whre to go. Maybe use another light for the back, I
> > try different things.
> >
> For me, this looks finished. I think that any additional light would
> ruin the effect.
>
> Thomas
I second Thomas. The only idea I have is to have more of the smaller (chrome?)
spheres traced at the grid as if they were rolling into the direction of the
cam. Only close to the centre line of the grid. May be you put a single smaller
"fiery" sphere among them. But I wouldn't do much more. The scene is close to
perfect IMO.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"MichaelJF" <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > On 25-11-2013 14:09, Fractracer wrote:
> > > Thanks, but now I don't know whre to go. Maybe use another light for the back, I
> > > try different things.
> > >
> > For me, this looks finished. I think that any additional light would
> > ruin the effect.
> >
> > Thomas
>
> I second Thomas. The only idea I have is to have more of the smaller (chrome?)
> spheres traced at the grid as if they were rolling into the direction of the
> cam. Only close to the centre line of the grid. May be you put a single smaller
> "fiery" sphere among them. But I wouldn't do much more. The scene is close to
> perfect IMO.
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
I have added some little spheres, but I have also modified the light:
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cgspherev2.png' (494 KB)
Preview of image 'cgspherev2.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/11/13 22:35, Fractracer wrote:
> "MichaelJF" <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>> On 25-11-2013 14:09, Fractracer wrote:
>>>> Thanks, but now I don't know whre to go. Maybe use another light for the back, I
>>>> try different things.
>>>>
>>> For me, this looks finished. I think that any additional light would
>>> ruin the effect.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>
>> I second Thomas. The only idea I have is to have more of the smaller (chrome?)
>> spheres traced at the grid as if they were rolling into the direction of the
>> cam. Only close to the centre line of the grid. May be you put a single smaller
>> "fiery" sphere among them. But I wouldn't do much more. The scene is close to
>> perfect IMO.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Michael
>
> I have added some little spheres, but I have also modified the light:
>
With the greatest of respect, I think this is going backwards. Too many
spheres and you're losing chiaroscuro .... but you're the artist. Your
decision.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor John <j.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> With the greatest of respect, I think this is going backwards. Too many
> spheres and you're losing chiaroscuro .... but you're the artist. Your
> decision.
>
> John
> --
> Protect the Earth
> It was not given to you by your parents
> You hold it in trust for your children
The problem is that I like the two images, I can't decide which is better. I
think I have to let it for a little time and return to work (or not) on it. The
image with "clair-obscur" seems not perfect (if the perfection exist) to me.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Fractracer" <lg.### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Here is another image of my work in progress for the CGSphere site.
> I've tried some new aspects of UberPov...
>
> I have found some rendering difference between the versions of Pov (v36, v36 and
I think all 3 versions of this image are good but this is my favourite.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/11/13 23:16, Fractracer wrote:
> Doctor John <j.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> With the greatest of respect, I think this is going backwards. Too many
>> spheres and you're losing chiaroscuro .... but you're the artist. Your
>> decision.
>>
>> John
>> --
>> Protect the Earth
>> It was not given to you by your parents
>> You hold it in trust for your children
>
> The problem is that I like the two images, I can't decide which is better. I
> think I have to let it for a little time and return to work (or not) on it. The
> image with "clair-obscur" seems not perfect (if the perfection exist) to me.
>
As you intimate, perfection probably does not exist. I would submit both
and wait for the votes.
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Doctor John on date 29/11/2013 0.25 wrote:
> As you intimate, perfection probably does not exist. I would submit both
> and wait for the votes.
>
> John
>
I second that!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 22.11.2013 09:07, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 21-11-2013 16:58, clipka wrote:
>> You'll need extra software to view all the file header contents though,
>> such as a hex editor.
>>
>
> Which explains my surprise ;-)
Just noted that Ive's fabulous IC image viewer will do the job, too:
Press "I", and in the "Metadata" section click on "Tags".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
