 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
textures...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'x_ship_one.jpg' (252 KB)
Preview of image 'x_ship_one.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Fractracer on date 01/08/2013 12.25 wrote:
>
> Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
> spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
> textures...
>
Nice colors.
I like especially the textures of the planet and of the space.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
> spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
> textures...
>
Nice model.
Those "lasers" are more like ion pulses.
I'd use some transparent object filled with emissive media.
I see some fasceting on the front part of the mid wings ridges. Try some
localised subdivision in those areas.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Another picture about space ships.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'crabe_ship_0.jpg' (577 KB)
Preview of image 'crabe_ship_0.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-8-2013 20:22, Alain wrote:
>>
>> Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
>> spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
>> textures...
>>
>
> Nice model.
>
> Those "lasers" are more like ion pulses.
he is firing lasers not laser beams
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel <byt### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> On 1-8-2013 20:22, Alain wrote:
> >>
> >> Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
> >> spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
> >> textures...
> >>
> >
> > Nice model.
> >
> > Those "lasers" are more like ion pulses.
>
> he is firing lasers not laser beams
They are lasers beans!
>
>
>
> --
> Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
> necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Another picture about space ships.
>
Nice and strange AIR ships. Space ships don't need any wings or any
thing looking like wings as there is no air to travel through.
In fact, a space ship don't need to be nicely profiled, they can be
realy boxy with the function dictating the shape.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 1-8-2013 20:22, Alain wrote:
>>>
>>> Here a picture of a space ship - (this is a Worth In Pieces) - model of
>>> spaceship under wings3D and render with PovRay. Some works on lasers,
>>> textures...
>>>
>>
>> Nice model.
>>
>> Those "lasers" are more like ion pulses.
>
> he is firing lasers not laser beams
>
>
>
Laser ARE beams. Laser beam is a pleonasm.
Laser can be pulsed, it only mean that the beam is not continous.
Next, in space, a laser would be invisible unless it have an astronomic
power level, I mean, in the multi peta-watt range...
Given the speed of light, even short, high frequency, laser pulses
should be *MUCH* longer and you should only be able to see one, maybe
two at most, unless your scene covers 10000 Km or more. Then, your ships
would be so small and far away from each other that you won't be able to
apreciate them.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 08.08.2013 20:27, schrieb Alain:
>> he is firing lasers not laser beams
>
> Laser ARE beams. Laser beam is a pleonasm.
Rule #1 when nitpicking: Don't, until you know what you're talking
about, because you'll inevitably be out out-smartassed :-P
LASER = "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation" -
that's neither a beam, nor an apparatus, but a principle.
A proper term for a beam generated using this principle would be
"coherent beam of light" if all you want to describe is the properties
of the beam; but if you want to also reference the particular principle
used to generate it, "laser beam" would be perfectly appropriate (while
"laser light" would indeed be nonsense).
If you accept the acronym of the underlying principle to denote a beam
generated using it, then it is just as acceptable to denote an apparatus
using this principle to generate the beam - though of course "Laser
source" would be more precise.
Of course, propelling a volley of laser apparatuses would entirely be
possible, might look somewhat like depicted, and science fiction authors
might even invent /some/ reason for doing so, rather than just shooting
slugs of lead, tungsten or DU...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 08.08.2013 20:27, schrieb Alain:
>
> >> he is firing lasers not laser beams
> >
> > Laser ARE beams. Laser beam is a pleonasm.
>
> Rule #1 when nitpicking: Don't, until you know what you're talking
> about, because you'll inevitably be out out-smartassed :-P
>
> LASER = "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation" -
> that's neither a beam, nor an apparatus, but a principle.
>
> A proper term for a beam generated using this principle would be
> "coherent beam of light" if all you want to describe is the properties
> of the beam; but if you want to also reference the particular principle
> used to generate it, "laser beam" would be perfectly appropriate (while
> "laser light" would indeed be nonsense).
>
> If you accept the acronym of the underlying principle to denote a beam
> generated using it, then it is just as acceptable to denote an apparatus
> using this principle to generate the beam - though of course "Laser
> source" would be more precise.
>
> Of course, propelling a volley of laser apparatuses would entirely be
> possible, might look somewhat like depicted, and science fiction authors
> might even invent /some/ reason for doing so, rather than just shooting
> slugs of lead, tungsten or DU...
Whaowhaowhao...I have just made a picture, I don't want to know if it's real or
not... I don't care if lasers are or not visible, it's art! And with art all is
possible.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
