Am 22.03.2013 15:46, schrieb s.day:

> Thanks for noticing the shiny rust, I have modified this and think the result is
> a  subtle but good improvement.

I think this is spot-on.

Post a reply to this message

Hi(gh)!

On 23.03.2013 00:08, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:

> Yes... now it just needs a nice scene to be lit. :)

What about a dimly lit mud-walled chai khana (tea house) in some remote 
Afghan valley? With bearded turbaned Afghans in traditional garb 
lounging around a slightly indented samowar, on faded rugs spread over 
the floor...

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar

Now playing: Cybersports (Synergy)

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 22.03.2013 15:46, schrieb s.day:
>
> > Thanks for noticing the shiny rust, I have modified this and think the result is
> > a  subtle but good improvement.
>
> I think this is spot-on.

Thanks clipka,

Would have taken me a lot longer without your advice/help on the correct finish
and radosity settings.

Sean

Post a reply to this message

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_=27Yadgar=27_Bleimann?= <yaz### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 23.03.2013 00:08, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>
> > Yes... now it just needs a nice scene to be lit. :)
>
> What about a dimly lit mud-walled chai khana (tea house) in some remote
> Afghan valley? With bearded turbaned Afghans in traditional garb
> lounging around a slightly indented samowar, on faded rugs spread over
> the floor...
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar
>
> Now playing: Cybersports (Synergy)

Sounds like a good idea for a scene, I tend not to include people in my scenes
as I prefer to go for realism (not everyones goal I know) and have no chance of
achieving this with people in the scene (I know some people manage this but I
really have no experience of modelling people).

Other than that I like the idea, maybe will give it a go after I complete the
current scene I am working on. Then if someone else wants to add the people I
will post the source.

Sean

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 20.03.2013 22:47, schrieb s.day:
> > Trying to age my lantern, HDR seems to look better with new shiny objects
> > though...
>
> I think you're proving yourself utterly wrong here: This one looks
> excellent! May need some more work to look like what you intend it to
> (I'd try for a zone where the paint is already blistered but still holds
> on), but it looks realistic nonetheless (this one would be iron without
> significant rust but a very bad paint job that is already flaking).

I have an area between the paint and rust which has a crackle normal to attempt
to add a flakey paint surface, it doesn't show up that well in this render so a
few more tweaks may be required (although I sometimes end up tweaking so much I
never finish anything).

Post a reply to this message

Am 24.03.2013 19:03, schrieb s.day:

> Sounds like a good idea for a scene, I tend not to include people in my scenes
> as I prefer to go for realism (not everyones goal I know) and have no chance of
> achieving this with people in the scene (I know some people manage this but I
> really have no experience of modelling people).

The secret to that is actually quite simple: Use Poser, DAZ Studio, or 
any other such tool (though I currently know of none other than these 
two), and export the figures with PoseRay. There's no other sane way if 
you want to go for realism.

Post a reply to this message

Am 24.03.2013 15:30, schrieb s.day:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>> Am 22.03.2013 15:46, schrieb s.day:
>>
>>> Thanks for noticing the shiny rust, I have modified this and think the result is
>>> a  subtle but good improvement.
>>
>> I think this is spot-on.
>
> Thanks clipka,
>
> Would have taken me a lot longer without your advice/help on the correct finish
> and radosity settings.

See? I told you that would be good starting points ;-)

Post a reply to this message

On 25-3-2013 14:18, clipka wrote:
> The secret to that is actually quite simple: Use Poser, DAZ Studio, or
> any other such tool (though I currently know of none other than these
> two), and export the figures with PoseRay. There's no other sane way if
> you want to go for realism.
>

There seems to be http://www.makehuman.org/ although I never used it.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 25-3-2013 14:18, clipka wrote:
> > The secret to that is actually quite simple: Use Poser, DAZ Studio, or
> > any other such tool (though I currently know of none other than these
> > two), and export the figures with PoseRay. There's no other sane way if
> > you want to go for realism.
> >
>
> There seems to be http://www.makehuman.org/ although I never used it.
>
> Thomas

That looks interesting, especially the Geisha project gallery. I did download
Poser several years ago but never really gave it enough time/effort. Will add
these to my ever growing to do list.

Does anyone have any preference between Poser and DAZ (I have never looked at
the latter).

Sean

Post a reply to this message

On 25-3-2013 19:16, s.day wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> There seems to be http://www.makehuman.org/ although I never used it.
>
> That looks interesting, especially the Geisha project gallery. I did download
> Poser several years ago but never really gave it enough time/effort. Will add
> these to my ever growing to do list.
>
> Does anyone have any preference between Poser and DAZ (I have never looked at
> the latter).

There was some discussion about this on the TinaChep forum some time 
ago... I am unable to find the exact link to the thread unfortunately at 
present (-:

Personally, I much favour Poser above DAZ, more especially for the way 
in which you can work with dynamic clothes, which I have been totally 
unable to do in DAZ. Overall, although the first impression seems to 
point otherwise, I find Poser to have much more freedom of use than DAZ.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message