 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_=27Yadgar=27_Bleimann?= <yaz### [at] gmx de> wrote:
> Just for archival purposes: earlier on, you posted using a different
> e-mail nick - as since 2000, I keep a private archive of p.b.i. images
> with one folder for each artist, I stored your earlier pictures under
> that name. But I currently don't remember what name it was - can you
> help me out? Then I would merge the new "posfan12" folder with the old
> one...
>
> See you in Khyberspace - www.khyberspace.de
>
> Yadgar
>
> Now playing: Got Me Under Pressure (ZZ Top)
I went by SharkD at the time. Hope that helps!
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Larger version with added flavor text.
"Visit Athera today!"
http://gearheadrpg.com/wiki/index.php?title=Athera_Spinner
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_2400_s_text.jpg' (711 KB)
Preview of image 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_2400_s_text.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/06/2011 2:43 PM, posfan12 wrote:
> I went by SharkD at the time. Hope that helps!
Oo! I remember you from way back.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Made some modifications that I think better accentuate the station's scale. The
station is a bit longer, and there are horizontal gaps between the station
sections. I think the effect of the gaps is the same as stripes on a shirt: it
makes the object appear longer and thinner.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_text.jpg' (728 KB)
Preview of image 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_text.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Exterior view. Not very exciting.
--
http://isometricland.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_temp_008.jpg' (109 KB)
Preview of image 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_temp_008.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 23.06.2011 23:53, schrieb SharkD:
> Exterior view. Not very exciting.
The attitude control system lacks thrusters tangential to the cylinder,
to stabilize the station with regard to axial rotation.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/23/2011 7:03 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 23.06.2011 23:53, schrieb SharkD:
>> Exterior view. Not very exciting.
>
> The attitude control system lacks thrusters tangential to the cylinder,
> to stabilize the station with regard to axial rotation.
Yeah. Not sure where to put the fuel tanks for the thrusters then though.
Also, I want to add a reactor for the lamp lighting the station. What
should it look like, and should I get rid of the solar panels?
--
http://isometricland.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2011/06/23 20:07, SharkD a écrit :
> On 6/23/2011 7:03 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 23.06.2011 23:53, schrieb SharkD:
>>> Exterior view. Not very exciting.
>>
>> The attitude control system lacks thrusters tangential to the cylinder,
>> to stabilize the station with regard to axial rotation.
>
>
> Yeah. Not sure where to put the fuel tanks for the thrusters then though.
>
> Also, I want to add a reactor for the lamp lighting the station. What
> should it look like, and should I get rid of the solar panels?
>
The fuel tanks for the attitude thrusters are relatively small as they
are relatively rarely used, and for only short times. They can logicaly
be located inside the outer shell.
Get rid of the solar pannels? Why?
Solar energy is the ONLY resource that is not scarse up there. You want
to get as much of it as possible. For that reason, I think that the
solar pannels sould be at least 10 to 100 times larger.
Having extra energy allows for beter recycling of the air and water,
improve food production and greatly helps producing the manufactured
goods you need. It can also help with your trusters by using ion based
thrusters or chimical thrusters fitted with some overheating device to
greatly increase ejection speed, and thus, get more thrust from the same
amount of propellant. Use smaller fuel storage, and make it last much,
much longer.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Changed the way the panels are done, added some details.
--
http://isometricland.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_044_2400_text.jpg' (895 KB)
Preview of image 'gh_scene_spinner_cutaway_044_2400_text.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/23/2011 11:49 PM, Alain wrote:
> The fuel tanks for the attitude thrusters are relatively small as they
> are relatively rarely used, and for only short times. They can logicaly
> be located inside the outer shell.
>
> Get rid of the solar pannels? Why?
> Solar energy is the ONLY resource that is not scarse up there. You want
> to get as much of it as possible. For that reason, I think that the
> solar pannels sould be at least 10 to 100 times larger.
> Having extra energy allows for beter recycling of the air and water,
> improve food production and greatly helps producing the manufactured
> goods you need. It can also help with your trusters by using ion based
> thrusters or chimical thrusters fitted with some overheating device to
> greatly increase ejection speed, and thus, get more thrust from the same
> amount of propellant. Use smaller fuel storage, and make it last much,
> much longer.
>
>
>
> Alain
Well, I just thought both a reactor and solar panels were a bit redundant.
--
http://isometricland.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
