 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks like something out of Spore...
The lighting looks superb. Ever thought about trying to replicate (if
not even improve) this with pov3.7's SSLT?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/20/2011 8:09 PM, nemesis wrote:
> hey, don't you think it would look kinda cool in a miniaturized focal blur look?
> come on, you're using fast fake SSS... :)
Yep, it's planned for the next render :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/21/2011 2:42 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> I originally set off to create something nightmarish, disturbing...
>> something reflecting my mood, perhaps. But as I was working toward my
>> questionable goal, I realized that the thing I was making actually
>> seemed... friendly. Even cute, in a weird way.
>
> Obviously, your idea of "friendly looking" is very different than
> mine... to not talk about "cute". :)
You wouln't happen to be a xenophobe, by chance? :P
> Great work, as usual!
Thanks Jaime :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/21/2011 4:25 AM, Ive wrote:
> Am 20.03.2011 06:42, schrieb Samuel Benge:
>> He's still a bit freakish (probably the result a genetic experiment),
>> but he
>> means well :)
>
> love him - but I'm not so sure about my cat ;)
I think our cat would eat him, if given the chance...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/21/2011 9:57 AM, Warp wrote:
> Looks like something out of Spore...
I kind of thought so too (though I've never actually played the game).
> The lighting looks superb. Ever thought about trying to replicate (if
> not even improve) this with pov3.7's SSLT?
Thanks.
I might give SSLT a shot, but to tell you the truth (and to possibly
state the obvious) I'm impatient when it comes to rendering. Some
features take waaay to long. But then again, if I use Rune's
illusion.inc I would only have to render the SSS once, plus I could use
focal blur and blurred reflections and whatnot.
I've been wondering if SSLT could actually be sped up by making it
behave more like radiosity, where there are patches of luminance
becoming concentrated near "hot spots." SSLT's pixel noise can be so
difficult to smooth out...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Strange creatures in the abysses...
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 22.03.2011 00:01, schrieb stbenge:
> I might give SSLT a shot, but to tell you the truth (and to possibly
> state the obvious) I'm impatient when it comes to rendering. Some
> features take waaay to long. But then again, if I use Rune's
> illusion.inc I would only have to render the SSS once, plus I could use
> focal blur and blurred reflections and whatnot.
You'll have to wait until RC4 anyway; RC3 SSLT doesn't play nice with
combinations of multiple primitives.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 22.03.2011 00:01, schrieb stbenge:
> I've been wondering if SSLT could actually be sped up by making it
> behave more like radiosity, where there are patches of luminance
> becoming concentrated near "hot spots." SSLT's pixel noise can be so
> difficult to smooth out...
Improvements of that type have already been on the (undisclosed) roadmap
ever since SSLT's first appearance in a beta version. Will take some
time though. Did I ever mention that SSLT is still in a very
experimental state of implementation? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
> You wouln't happen to be a xenophobe, by chance? :P
In this case it would be a mix of ichthyophobia and scoleciphobia, I
guess, given the look of the creature. ;)
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka escreveu:
> Am 22.03.2011 00:01, schrieb stbenge:
>
>> I've been wondering if SSLT could actually be sped up by making it
>> behave more like radiosity, where there are patches of luminance
>> becoming concentrated near "hot spots." SSLT's pixel noise can be so
>> difficult to smooth out...
>
> Improvements of that type have already been on the (undisclosed) roadmap
> ever since SSLT's first appearance in a beta version. Will take some
> time though. Did I ever mention that SSLT is still in a very
> experimental state of implementation? ;-)
BTW, will radiosity finally come out of its 10+ years beta state? even
gmail did... ;)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
